From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] -stack-info-frames
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17076.40345.707267.980803@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u64wb29pg.fsf@gnu.org>
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > > Is the actual/new behavior any different, and if so, how?
> >
> > The only behaviour that I've changed is that -stack-selected-frame must
> > have an argument. This now accurately reflects existing documentation.
(I mean -stack-select-frame, of course)
> But the above snippet is taken from the documentation of
> "-stack-list-frames", not from "-stack-selected-frame". How is that
> relevant?
As you maintain the documentation, I took the question to mean
"Does the documentation reflect the actual/new behaviour". I replied
about new behaviour. -stack-list-frames hasn't been changed and AFAIK
the documentation about it is accurate.
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-18 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-17 22:51 Nick Roberts
2005-06-17 23:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-17 23:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-18 1:28 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-18 1:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-18 3:16 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-18 8:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-18 8:51 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-18 10:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-18 15:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-18 22:48 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2005-06-18 15:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-18 22:48 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-18 23:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-19 3:39 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-19 14:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-19 18:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-19 22:31 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-20 3:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-19 22:31 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-20 0:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-20 1:24 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-20 1:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-20 3:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-20 5:03 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-20 13:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-20 21:48 ` [PATCH] MI error messages Nick Roberts
2005-06-20 22:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-06-21 3:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-21 8:50 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-06-21 9:40 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-21 19:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-21 21:43 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-21 21:59 ` Jason Molenda
2005-06-22 3:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-22 3:41 ` Jason Molenda
2005-06-22 3:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-22 7:27 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-23 3:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-22 13:04 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-21 22:01 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-22 11:06 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-22 11:24 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-06-22 19:19 ` Jason Molenda
2005-06-22 21:55 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-19 21:55 ` [PATCH] -stack-info-frames Jason Molenda
2005-06-19 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-17 23:11 ` Jason Molenda
2005-06-17 23:31 ` Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17076.40345.707267.980803@farnswood.snap.net.nz \
--to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox