From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: eliz@elta.co.il
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [RFA/doco] add obstacks to gdbint.texi
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16425.5280.824503.7068@localhost.redhat.com> (raw)
Eli, I am sure it's not perfect. How do I quote function names, for
instance?
2004-02-10 Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
* gdbint.texinfo (Support Libraries): Add doco about obstacks and
minimal information about libiberty.
Index: gdbint.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.183
diff -u -p -r1.183 gdbint.texinfo
--- gdbint.texinfo 26 Jan 2004 20:52:13 -0000 1.183
+++ gdbint.texinfo 10 Feb 2004 17:27:58 -0000
@@ -4678,6 +4678,63 @@ library because it's also used in binuti
@section mmalloc
@section libiberty
+@cindex libiberty library
+
+The libiberty library provides a set of functions and features that
+integrate and improve on functionality found in modern operating
+systems. Broadly speaking, such features can be divided into three
+groups: supplemental functions (functions that may be missing in some
+environments and operating systems), replacement functions (providing
+a uniform and easier to use interface for commonly used standard
+functions), and extensions (which provide additional functionality
+beyond standard functions).
+
+@value{GDBN} uses various features provided by the libiberty library,
+for instance the memory management functions xfree and xmalloc, and
+the obstack extension.
+
+@subsection obstacks in @value{GDBN}
+
+The obstack mechanism provides a convenient way to allocate and free
+chunks of memory. Each obstack is a pool of memory that is managed like
+a stack. Objects (of any nature, size and alignment) are allocated and
+freed in a LIFO fashion on an obstack. (See the libiberty's
+documenatation for a more detailed explanation of obstacks.)
+
+The most noticeable use of the obstacks in @value{GDBN} is in object
+files. There is an obstack associated with each internal
+representation of an object file. Lots of things get allocated on
+these obstacks: dictionary entries, blocks, blockvectors, symbols,
+minimal symbols, types, vectors of fundamental types, class fields of
+types, object files section lists, object files section offets lists,
+line tables, symbol tables, partial symbol tables, string tables,
+symbol table private data, macros tables, debug information sections
+and entries, import and export lists (som), unwind information (hppa),
+dwarf2 location expressions data. Plus various strings such as
+directory names strings, debug format strings, names of types.
+
+An essential and convenient property of all data on obstacks is that
+memory for it gets allocated (with obstack_alloc) at various times
+during a debugging sesssion, but it is released all at once using the
+obstack_free function. The obstack_free function takes a pointer to
+where in the stack it must start the deletion from (much like the
+cleanup chains have a pointer to where to start the cleanups).
+Because of the stack like structure of the obstacks, this allows to
+free only a top portion of the obstack. There are a few instances in
+@value{GDBN} where such thing happens. Calls to obstack_free are done
+after some local data is allocated to the obstack. Only the local data
+is deleted from the obstack. Of course this assumes that nothing
+between the obstack_alloc and the obstack_free allocates anything else
+on the same obstack. For this reason it is best and safest to use
+temporary obstacks.
+
+Releasing the whole obstack is also not safe per se. It is safe only
+under the condition that we know the obstacks memory is no longer
+needed. In @value{GDBN} we get rid of the obstacks only when we get
+rid of the whole objfile(s), for instance upon reading a new symbol
+file.
+
+
@section gnu-regex
@cindex regular expressions library
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-10 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-10 17:31 Elena Zannoni [this message]
2004-02-10 19:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-10 19:51 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-10 20:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-10 20:38 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-11 6:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-11 15:41 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-11 19:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-10 19:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-10 20:06 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-10 20:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16425.5280.824503.7068@localhost.redhat.com \
--to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@elta.co.il \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox