Re: [Patch] fix for PR:1291 (Ping Corinna)

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>]

Kris Warkentin writes:
 > Howdy all,
 > 
 > Finally got around to building a head branch gdb with Corinna's sh4 work.
 > Excellent job.  The backtrace works perfectly now and renders my patch
 > redundant.  Someone can probably put this PR to fixed-test.
 > 

Could you still come up with a small testcase to be added to gdb.arch?

elena


 > cheers,
 > 
 > Kris
 > 
 > ----- Original Message ----- 
 > From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
 > To: "Elena Zannoni" <ezannoni@redhat.com>
 > Cc: <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
 > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:21 PM
 > Subject: Re: [Patch] fix for PR:1291
 > 
 > 
 > > > kewarken writes:
 > > >  > Credit to inaba@src.ricoh.co.jp for his original find and patch and
 > to
 > > >  > Colin Burgess for noting the differences between gcc 2 and 3.
 > > >  >
 > > >  > ChangeLog:
 > > >  >
 > > >  > 2003-09-16  Kris Warkentin  <kewarken@qnx.com>
 > > >  >
 > > >  > * sh-tdep.c: Properly detect frame prologues for functions with
 > > >  > more than 256 bytes of local variables.
 > > >
 > > > You should give credit to these folks in the changelog entry.
 > >
 > > Certainly.
 > >
 > > > I wonder if this can be captured in a test case?  How does your change
 > > > interacts with Corinna's rewrite?
 > >
 > > I'll take a look at it when I have some more time next week.  The test
 > case
 > > is very simple so I can easily check to see if Corinna's stuff fixes it.
 > > Unfortunately my available gdb cycles have been extremely low lately since
 > > we have a lot of critical internal stuff that I've been grabbed for.
 > >
 > > cheers,
 > >
 > > Kris
 > >
 > >
 >