From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] generate symbols associated to namespaces
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 22:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16222.18907.572350.938649@localhost.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yf2he3lu2os.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com>
David Carlton writes:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:51:37 -0400, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
> > David Carlton writes:
>
> >> + psym = add_psymbol_to_list (pdi->name, strlen (pdi->name),
> >> + VAR_DOMAIN, LOC_STATIC,
> >> + &objfile->static_psymbols,
> >> + 0, addr + baseaddr,
> >> + cu_language, objfile);
>
> > I don't like this too much. I.e. changing add_psymbol_to_list to
> > return a value so you can get a hold of the psym. After all,
> > add_psymbol_to_list doesn't change any of the fields of the psymbol,
> > and cp_check_possible_namespace_symbols uses 2 fields that you
> > already have around.
>
> No, add_psymbol_to_list does change the fields: it calls
> SYMBOL_SET_NAMES to set the demangled name, which I need in
> cp_check_possible_namespace_symbols. So having add_psymbol_to_list
> return the psymbol seems the best solution; I suppose I could break
> out the demangled-name-caching code that SYMBOL_SET_NAMES uses into a
> separate function, but it doesn't seem worth it here.
>
Oh, right. I really don't like it. Only these few callers of
add_psymbol_to_list use its return value. But you are right, that
function does quite a bit. Sigh. I don't see any alternative, then.
Ok on the rest.
elena
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-09 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-16 20:22 David Carlton
2003-06-22 17:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-24 19:00 ` David Carlton
2003-06-24 19:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-27 16:04 ` David Carlton
2003-06-27 21:58 ` David Carlton
2003-06-27 22:32 ` David Carlton
2003-08-05 16:30 ` David Carlton
2003-08-05 17:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-05 18:06 ` David Carlton
2003-08-05 18:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-05 18:18 ` David Carlton
2003-08-31 19:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-02 16:38 ` David Carlton
2003-09-09 19:42 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-09-09 20:28 ` David Carlton
2003-09-09 22:17 ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
2003-09-09 23:25 ` David Carlton
2003-09-11 19:52 ` David Carlton
2003-09-17 20:41 ` David Carlton
2003-09-11 23:28 ` [rfa] use allocate_block more David Carlton
2003-09-11 23:33 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-09-11 23:44 ` David Carlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16222.18907.572350.938649@localhost.redhat.com \
--to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=carlton@kealia.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox