Re: [patch/rfc/rfa:sh] gdbarch_register_read() -> gdbarch_cooked_register_read()

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>]

Elena Zannoni writes:
 > Andrew Cagney writes:
 >  > Hello,
 >  > 
 >  > The attached patch replaces the architecture vector interface:
 >  > 
 >  >    void gdbarch_register_read (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum, char 
 >  > *buf);
 >  > 
 >  > with the new interface:
 >  > 
 >  >    void gdbarch_cooked_register_read (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct 
 >  > regcache *regcache, int regnum, void *buf)
 >  > 
 >  > and then fixes the consequnces (all syntatic).
 >  > 
 >  > 
 >  > One NB.  The parameter set is technically redundant.  The assertion:
 >  > 
 >  > 	gdbarch == regcache_gdbarch (regcache)
 >  > 
 >  > always holds so the gdbarch parameter isn't strictly needed.  I figured 
 >  > that it is more convenient to include the gdbarch as a parameter and 
 >  > save everyone the hassle of including the above line in their *-tdep code.
 >  > 
 >  > The SH stuff should be reviewed.  I think its on the right track since 
 >  > sh-tdep.c no longer refers to current_regcache!!!
 >  > 


So, wait a minute, is the sh the only port that overwrites the generic
register reads and writes to handle pseudo registers?


Elena