From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] PPC ABI compliance fix
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15515.42195.51105.78562@localhost.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1020322204651.ZM27792@localhost.localdomain>
Kevin Buettner writes:
> On Mar 22, 2:28pm, Elena Zannoni wrote:
>
> > Back in November, gcc changed the way structures <= 8 bytes are
> > returned on the PPC. The change was made to be compliant with the
> > SVR4 ABI.
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-11/msg01468.html
> >
> > The abi specifies that such structures are passed in r3 and r4.
> > Bigger structures are passed in memory.
> >
> > Gcc was passing every structure in memory. The change was made for
> > embedded targets, but not for natives (PowerPC Linux, NetBSD, and
> > FreeBSD).
> >
> > Of course this change breaks binary compatibility with older gcc's.
> > Not sure what to do about that, if anything, the case it covers is a
> > corner case, anyway.
>
> Hmm... I have a hunch that, eventually, the natives will need to
> change too.
>
Gcc is explicitly disabling ABI compliance for the natives. I think
Aldy asked to the gcc mailing list if he could change at least Linux,
and there was a loud 'No'.
> For now though, your change is okay.
>
> (Alternately, we could take a really hard nosed stance and implement
> the ABI exactly as written and just put up with the failures.)
>
Ironically enough the gcc implementation is not correct, yet. It
screws up where exactly in r3 and r4 it puts the structure if the
structure is strictly less than 8 bytes. :-(
For instances 5 characters are stored like
R3 R4
. . . h e l l o
Instead of
R3 R4
h e l l o . . .
I thought Aldy was taking care of this, but he has gone on vacation.
Elena
> Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-22 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-22 11:28 Elena Zannoni
2002-03-22 11:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-22 12:06 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-03-22 12:37 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-03-22 12:47 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-03-22 13:41 ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
2002-03-22 14:01 ` Elena Zannoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15515.42195.51105.78562@localhost.redhat.com \
--to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox