Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
		Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFAv2 3/3] Make symtab.c better styled.
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1549996909.1438.7.camel@skynet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1174f8d-266a-1a7e-d57d-b6c7d77c6f9f@redhat.com>

On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 15:53 +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 02/12/2019 02:54 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Pedro Alves wrote:
> > 
> > > So the question becomes a simple cosmetic one.  In this case:
> > > 
> > > >   (gdb) info variables
> > > >   [...]
> > > >   Non-debugging symbols:
> > > >   0x0000000010020088  main
> > > 
> > > Should "main" be printed with function style, or variable style.
> > > This basically affects the color used to print the symbol.
> > > 
> > > In Philippe's patch, we'd print it in variable style.  If we used
> > > msymbol_is_function instead of his "is text symbol" check, we'd
> > > print it in function style.
> > 
> > Ah, I see.  I guess that doesn't really matter that much at this
> > point.  Since we're already showing it under "variables" we might
> > as well use the variable style.  But in the end either way would
> > be fine with me ...
> 
> OK, in that case, let's just use with Philippe already has.
Thanks for the review and discussion.
With all this + the feedback of Joel
(in https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-01/msg00560.html
that confirmed that the ada-lang.c code will effectively use
function style only to style function names), I am assuming
I can push the series (I will retest before that).

Thanks

Philippe


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-12 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20190212145443.E2799D8028D@oc3748833570.ibm.com>
2019-02-12 15:53 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-12 18:41   ` Philippe Waroquiers [this message]
2019-01-12 22:28 [RFAv2 0/3] Have GDB " Philippe Waroquiers
2019-01-12 22:28 ` [RFAv2 3/3] Make symtab.c " Philippe Waroquiers
2019-01-17 22:25   ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-07 18:58   ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-09 10:36     ` Philippe Waroquiers
2019-02-12 13:27       ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-12 14:04         ` Ulrich Weigand
2019-02-12 14:32           ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1549996909.1438.7.camel@skynet.be \
    --to=philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox