From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] S390: Migrate watch areas from list to VEC type
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473940907-4449-1-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473940399-2891-1-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
For S390, the list of active watchpoints is maintained in a list based
at "watch_base". This refactors the list to a vector "watch_areas".
gdb/ChangeLog:
* s390-linux-nat.c (s390_watch_area): New typedef. Define a VEC.
(watch_base): Remove variable.
(watch_areas): New variable.
(s390_stopped_by_watchpoint): Transform operations on the
watch_base list to equivalent operations on the watch_areas VEC.
(s390_prepare_to_resume): Likewise.
(s390_insert_watchpoint): Likewise.
(s390_remove_watchpoint): Likewise.
---
gdb/s390-linux-nat.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/s390-linux-nat.c b/gdb/s390-linux-nat.c
index 1e937f9..13bf7fd 100644
--- a/gdb/s390-linux-nat.c
+++ b/gdb/s390-linux-nat.c
@@ -436,14 +436,15 @@ s390_linux_store_inferior_registers (struct target_ops *ops,
The only thing we actually need is the total address space area
spanned by the watchpoints. */
-struct watch_area
+typedef struct watch_area
{
- struct watch_area *next;
CORE_ADDR lo_addr;
CORE_ADDR hi_addr;
-};
+} s390_watch_area;
+
+DEF_VEC_O (s390_watch_area);
-static struct watch_area *watch_base = NULL;
+VEC_s390_watch_area *watch_areas = NULL;
static int
s390_stopped_by_watchpoint (struct target_ops *ops)
@@ -453,7 +454,7 @@ s390_stopped_by_watchpoint (struct target_ops *ops)
int result;
/* Speed up common case. */
- if (!watch_base)
+ if (VEC_empty (s390_watch_area, watch_areas))
return 0;
parea.len = sizeof (per_lowcore);
@@ -487,7 +488,8 @@ s390_prepare_to_resume (struct lwp_info *lp)
ptrace_area parea;
CORE_ADDR watch_lo_addr = (CORE_ADDR)-1, watch_hi_addr = 0;
- struct watch_area *area;
+ unsigned ix;
+ s390_watch_area *area;
struct arch_lwp_info *lp_priv = lwp_arch_private_info (lp);
if (lp_priv == NULL || !lp_priv->per_info_changed)
@@ -499,20 +501,22 @@ s390_prepare_to_resume (struct lwp_info *lp)
if (tid == 0)
tid = ptid_get_pid (ptid_of_lwp (lp));
- for (area = watch_base; area; area = area->next)
- {
- watch_lo_addr = min (watch_lo_addr, area->lo_addr);
- watch_hi_addr = max (watch_hi_addr, area->hi_addr);
- }
-
parea.len = sizeof (per_info);
parea.process_addr = (addr_t) & per_info;
parea.kernel_addr = offsetof (struct user_regs_struct, per_info);
if (ptrace (PTRACE_PEEKUSR_AREA, tid, &parea, 0) < 0)
perror_with_name (_("Couldn't retrieve watchpoint status"));
- if (watch_base)
+ if (!VEC_empty (s390_watch_area, watch_areas))
{
+ for (ix = 0;
+ VEC_iterate (s390_watch_area, watch_areas, ix, area);
+ ix++)
+ {
+ watch_lo_addr = min (watch_lo_addr, area->lo_addr);
+ watch_hi_addr = max (watch_hi_addr, area->hi_addr);
+ }
+
per_info.control_regs.bits.em_storage_alteration = 1;
per_info.control_regs.bits.storage_alt_space_ctl = 1;
}
@@ -575,16 +579,11 @@ s390_insert_watchpoint (struct target_ops *self,
CORE_ADDR addr, int len, enum target_hw_bp_type type,
struct expression *cond)
{
- struct watch_area *area = XNEW (struct watch_area);
+ s390_watch_area area;
- if (!area)
- return -1;
-
- area->lo_addr = addr;
- area->hi_addr = addr + len - 1;
-
- area->next = watch_base;
- watch_base = area;
+ area.lo_addr = addr;
+ area.hi_addr = addr + len - 1;
+ VEC_safe_push (s390_watch_area, watch_areas, &area);
return s390_refresh_per_info ();
}
@@ -594,25 +593,23 @@ s390_remove_watchpoint (struct target_ops *self,
CORE_ADDR addr, int len, enum target_hw_bp_type type,
struct expression *cond)
{
- struct watch_area *area, **parea;
-
- for (parea = &watch_base; *parea; parea = &(*parea)->next)
- if ((*parea)->lo_addr == addr
- && (*parea)->hi_addr == addr + len - 1)
- break;
+ unsigned ix;
+ s390_watch_area *area;
- if (!*parea)
+ for (ix = 0;
+ VEC_iterate (s390_watch_area, watch_areas, ix, area);
+ ix++)
{
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stderr,
- "Attempt to remove nonexistent watchpoint.\n");
- return -1;
+ if (area->lo_addr == addr && area->hi_addr == addr + len - 1)
+ {
+ VEC_unordered_remove (s390_watch_area, watch_areas, ix);
+ return s390_refresh_per_info ();
+ }
}
- area = *parea;
- *parea = area->next;
- xfree (area);
-
- return s390_refresh_per_info ();
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stderr,
+ "Attempt to remove nonexistent watchpoint.\n");
+ return -1;
}
static int
--
2.5.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-15 11:53 [PATCH 0/6] S390: Watchpoint enhancements and hardware breakpoints Andreas Arnez
2016-09-15 11:54 ` [PATCH] Fix order of inferiors in "thread apply all" Andreas Arnez
2016-09-15 12:03 ` Andreas Arnez
2016-09-15 11:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] S390: Avoid direct access to lwp_info structure Andreas Arnez
2016-09-15 12:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] S390: Multi-inferior watchpoint support Andreas Arnez
2016-09-15 12:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] S390: Enable "maint set show-debug-regs" Andreas Arnez
2016-09-15 12:02 ` Andreas Arnez [this message]
2016-09-15 12:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] S390: Hardware breakpoint support Andreas Arnez
2016-09-15 12:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] linux-nat: Add function lwp_is_stepping Andreas Arnez
2016-09-15 15:08 ` Yao Qi
2016-09-15 14:11 ` [PATCH 0/6] S390: Watchpoint enhancements and hardware breakpoints Pedro Alves
2016-09-16 12:43 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-09-16 15:43 ` Pedro Alves
2016-09-16 17:30 ` Andreas Arnez
2016-09-15 14:58 ` Yao Qi
2016-09-15 17:14 ` Andreas Arnez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1473940907-4449-1-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox