[patch] fnchange.lst: add mi2-var-*.

[patch] fnchange.lst: add mi2-var-*.

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

This patch updates fnchange.lst for the new mi2 files.
I saw this on the ARI page.

Testing: not tested.  Any ideas how to test this on a linux system?

I'm committing this to HEAD as obvious.  If the next ARI page says that it
is fixed, then I will commit it gdb_6_0-branch as well.

Michael C

2003-08-27  Michael Chastain  <mec@shout.net>

	* config/djgpp/fnchange.lst: Add gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi2-var-*.

Index: config/djgpp/fnchange.lst
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -c -3 -p -r1.55 fnchange.lst
*** config/djgpp/fnchange.lst	23 Aug 2003 03:59:43 -0000	1.55
--- config/djgpp/fnchange.lst	27 Aug 2003 19:19:10 -0000
***************
*** 209,214 ****
--- 209,218 ----
  @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi1-var-child.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi1varchild.exp
  @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi1-var-cmd.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi1varcmd.exp
  @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi1-var-display.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi1vardisplay.exp
+ @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi2-var-block.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi2varblock.exp
+ @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi2-var-child.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi2varchild.exp
+ @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi2-var-cmd.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi2varcmd.exp
+ @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi2-var-display.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi2vardisplay.exp
  @V@/gdb/tui/tuiSourceWin.c @V@/gdb/tui/tuiWinSource.c
  @V@/gdb/tui/tuiSourceWin.h @V@/gdb/tui/tuiWinSource.h
  @V@/gdb/x86-64-linux-tdep.c @V@/gdb/x8664-ltdep.c

Re: [patch] fnchange.lst: add mi2-var-*.

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:24:48 -0400
> From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
> 
> This patch updates fnchange.lst for the new mi2 files.
> I saw this on the ARI page.

Thanks!

> Testing: not tested.  Any ideas how to test this on a linux system?

Run the doschk program on the original file names, then rename and
run doschk again.  The second time it should not complain.

> I'm committing this to HEAD as obvious.  If the next ARI page says that it
> is fixed, then I will commit it gdb_6_0-branch as well.

Thanks.