From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 22/23] S/390: displaced stepping and PC-relative RIL-b/RIL-c instructions
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 12:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428410990-28560-23-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428410990-28560-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com>
This adds displaced stepping support for the General-Instruction
Extension Facility instructions, which have a PC-relative displacement
(RIL-b/RIL-c). We already handle RIL branches, but not others.
Currently, displaced stepping a breakpoint put on any of these
instructions results in the inferior crashing when or after the
instruction is executed out-of-line in the scratch pad.
This patch takes the easy route of patching the displacement in the
copy of the instruction in the scratch pad. As the displacement is a
signed 32-bit field, it's possible that the stratch pad ends too far
that the needed displacement doesn't fit in the adjusted instruction,
as e.g., if stepping over a breakpoint in a shared library (the
scratch pad is around the main program's entry point). That case is
detected and GDB falls back to stepping over the breakpoint in-line
(which involves pausing all threads momentarily).
(We could probably do something smarter, but I don't plan on doing it
myself. This was already sufficient to get "maint set target-non-stop
on" working regression free on S/390.)
Tested on S/390 RHEL 7.1, where it fixes a few hundred FAILs when
testing with displaced stepping enabled, with the end result being no
regressions compared to a test run that doesn't force displaced
stepping.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2015-04-07 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* s390-linux-tdep.c (is_non_branch_ril)
(s390_displaced_step_copy_insn): New functions.
(s390_displaced_step_fixup): Update comment.
(s390_gdbarch_init): Install s390_displaced_step_copy_insn as
gdbarch_displaced_step_copy_insn hook.
---
gdb/s390-linux-tdep.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/s390-linux-tdep.c b/gdb/s390-linux-tdep.c
index cafa57b..bdbc7c2 100644
--- a/gdb/s390-linux-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/s390-linux-tdep.c
@@ -1529,6 +1529,116 @@ s390_in_function_epilogue_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
/* Displaced stepping. */
+/* Return true if INSN is a non-branch RIL-b or RIL-c format
+ instruction. */
+
+static int
+is_non_branch_ril (gdb_byte *insn)
+{
+ gdb_byte op1 = insn[0];
+
+ if (op1 == 0xc4)
+ {
+ gdb_byte op2 = insn[1] & 0x0f;
+
+ switch (op2)
+ {
+ case 0x02: /* llhrl */
+ case 0x04: /* lghrl */
+ case 0x05: /* lhrl */
+ case 0x06: /* llghrl */
+ case 0x07: /* sthrl */
+ case 0x08: /* lgrl */
+ case 0x0b: /* stgrl */
+ case 0x0c: /* lgfrl */
+ case 0x0d: /* lrl */
+ case 0x0e: /* llgfrl */
+ case 0x0f: /* strl */
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+ else if (op1 == 0xc6)
+ {
+ gdb_byte op2 = insn[1] & 0x0f;
+
+ switch (op2)
+ {
+ case 0x00: /* exrl */
+ case 0x02: /* pfdrl */
+ case 0x04: /* cghrl */
+ case 0x05: /* chrl */
+ case 0x06: /* clghrl */
+ case 0x07: /* clhrl */
+ case 0x08: /* cgrl */
+ case 0x0a: /* clgrl */
+ case 0x0c: /* cgfrl */
+ case 0x0d: /* crl */
+ case 0x0e: /* clgfrl */
+ case 0x0f: /* clrl */
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Implementation of gdbarch_displaced_step_copy_insn. */
+
+static struct displaced_step_closure *
+s390_displaced_step_copy_insn (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
+ CORE_ADDR from, CORE_ADDR to,
+ struct regcache *regs)
+{
+ size_t len = gdbarch_max_insn_length (gdbarch);
+ gdb_byte *buf = xmalloc (len);
+ struct cleanup *old_chain = make_cleanup (xfree, buf);
+
+ read_memory (from, buf, len);
+
+ /* Adjust the displacement field of PC-relative RIL instructions,
+ except branches. The latter are handled in the fixup hook. */
+ if (is_non_branch_ril (buf))
+ {
+ LONGEST offset;
+
+ offset = extract_signed_integer (buf + 2, 4, BFD_ENDIAN_BIG);
+ offset = (from - to + offset * 2) / 2;
+
+ /* If the instruction is too far from the jump pad, punt. This
+ will usually happen with instructions in shared libraries.
+ We could probably support these by rewriting them to be
+ absolute or fully emulating them. */
+ if (offset < INT32_MIN || offset > INT32_MAX)
+ {
+ /* Let the core fall back to stepping over the breakpoint
+ in-line. */
+ if (debug_displaced)
+ {
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
+ "displaced: can't displaced step "
+ "RIL instruction: offset %s out of range\n",
+ plongest (offset));
+ }
+ do_cleanups (old_chain);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ store_signed_integer (buf + 2, 4, BFD_ENDIAN_BIG, offset);
+ }
+
+ write_memory (to, buf, len);
+
+ if (debug_displaced)
+ {
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "displaced: copy %s->%s: ",
+ paddress (gdbarch, from), paddress (gdbarch, to));
+ displaced_step_dump_bytes (gdb_stdlog, buf, len);
+ }
+
+ discard_cleanups (old_chain);
+ return (struct displaced_step_closure *) buf;
+}
+
/* Fix up the state of registers and memory after having single-stepped
a displaced instruction. */
static void
@@ -1537,8 +1647,7 @@ s390_displaced_step_fixup (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
CORE_ADDR from, CORE_ADDR to,
struct regcache *regs)
{
- /* Since we use simple_displaced_step_copy_insn, our closure is a
- copy of the instruction. */
+ /* Our closure is a copy of the instruction. */
gdb_byte *insn = (gdb_byte *) closure;
static int s390_instrlen[] = { 2, 4, 4, 6 };
int insnlen = s390_instrlen[insn[0] >> 6];
@@ -3291,7 +3400,7 @@ s390_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
/* Displaced stepping. */
set_gdbarch_displaced_step_copy_insn (gdbarch,
- simple_displaced_step_copy_insn);
+ s390_displaced_step_copy_insn);
set_gdbarch_displaced_step_fixup (gdbarch, s390_displaced_step_fixup);
set_gdbarch_displaced_step_free_closure (gdbarch,
simple_displaced_step_free_closure);
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-07 12:49 [PATCH v2 00/23] All-stop on top of non-stop Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] PR13858 - Can't do displaced stepping with no symbols Pedro Alves
2015-04-09 12:46 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] Disable displaced stepping if trying it fails Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] Fix gdb.base/sigstep.exp with displaced stepping on software single-step targets Pedro Alves
2015-04-10 9:56 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] remote.c/all-stop: Implement TARGET_WAITKIND_NO_RESUMED and TARGET_WNOHANG Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] Fix and test "checkpoint" in non-stop mode Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] PPC64: Fix step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp with displaced stepping on Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] Implement all-stop on top of a target running non-stop mode Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 13:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-08 9:34 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-08 9:53 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 11:08 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 19:35 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 19:41 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] Use keep_going in proceed and start_step_over too Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] Misc switch_back_to_stepped_thread cleanups Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/23] Change adjust_pc_after_break's prototype Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] Make gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp effective on !x86 Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] PPC64: symbol-file + exec-file results in broken displaced stepping Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] PPC64: Fix gdb.arch/ppc64-atomic-inst.exp with " Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] Fix signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp on targets always in non-stop Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] native Linux: enable always non-stop by default Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:55 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] Fix interrupt-noterm.exp on targets always in non-stop Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] Test step-over-{lands-on-breakpoint|trips-on-watchpoint}.exp with displaced stepping Pedro Alves
2015-04-10 14:54 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] Teach non-stop to do in-line step-overs (stop all, step, restart) Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] Embed the pending step-over chain in thread_info objects Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] Factor out code to re-resume stepped thread Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] Fix step-over-{trips-on-watchpoint|lands-on-breakpoint}.exp race Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/23] Make thread_still_needs_step_over consider stepping_over_watchpoint too Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 9:28 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-13 10:47 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 00/23] All-stop on top of non-stop Yao Qi
2015-04-08 10:17 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 10:30 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-10 8:41 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-10 8:50 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-10 8:22 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-10 8:34 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-10 9:26 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-13 15:28 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-13 16:16 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-13 16:23 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-13 16:23 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1428410990-28560-23-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox