From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 16/23] Fix signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp on targets always in non-stop
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 12:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428410990-28560-17-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428410990-28560-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com>
With "maint set target-non-stop on" we get:
-PASS: gdb.threads/signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp: step
+FAIL: gdb.threads/signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp: step
The issue is simply that switch_back_to_stepped_thread is not used in
non-stop mode, thus infrun doesn't output the expected "signal arrived
while stepping over breakpoint" log.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-07 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp: Use
gdb_test_sequence. Expect "restart threads" as alternative to
"switching back to stepped thread".
---
.../signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp
index bb00c50..1d5eabd 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp
@@ -95,19 +95,19 @@ gdb_test "set scheduler-locking off"
# Make sure we're exercising the paths we want to.
gdb_test "set debug infrun 1"
-gdb_test \
- "step" \
- ".*need to step-over.*resume \\(step=1.*signal arrived while stepping over breakpoint.*switching back to stepped thread.*stepped to a different line.*callme.*" \
- "step"
+set test "step"
+gdb_test_sequence $test $test {
+ "need to step-over \[^\r\n\]* first"
+ "resume \\(step=1"
+ "Program received signal SIGUSR1"
+ "(restart threads|signal arrived while stepping over breakpoint)"
+ "stepped to a different line"
+ "callme \\(\\);"
+}
set cnt_after [get_value "args\[$my_number\]" "get count after step"]
# Test that GDB doesn't inadvertently resume the stepped thread when a
# signal arrives while stepping over a breakpoint in another thread.
-set test "stepped thread under control"
-if { $cnt_before + 1 == $cnt_after } {
- pass $test
-} else {
- fail $test
-}
+gdb_assert { $cnt_before + 1 == $cnt_after } "stepped thread under control"
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-07 12:49 [PATCH v2 00/23] All-stop on top of non-stop Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/23] Change adjust_pc_after_break's prototype Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] Misc switch_back_to_stepped_thread cleanups Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] Use keep_going in proceed and start_step_over too Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] native Linux: enable always non-stop by default Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] PPC64: Fix gdb.arch/ppc64-atomic-inst.exp with displaced stepping Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] PPC64: symbol-file + exec-file results in broken " Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] Make gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp effective on !x86 Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] Fix gdb.base/sigstep.exp with displaced stepping on software single-step targets Pedro Alves
2015-04-10 9:56 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] S/390: displaced stepping and PC-relative RIL-b/RIL-c instructions Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] PR13858 - Can't do displaced stepping with no symbols Pedro Alves
2015-04-09 12:46 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] Disable displaced stepping if trying it fails Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] Implement all-stop on top of a target running non-stop mode Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 13:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-08 9:34 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-08 9:53 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 11:08 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 19:35 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 19:41 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] PPC64: Fix step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp with displaced stepping on Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] Fix and test "checkpoint" in non-stop mode Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] remote.c/all-stop: Implement TARGET_WAITKIND_NO_RESUMED and TARGET_WNOHANG Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:55 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] Fix interrupt-noterm.exp on targets always in non-stop Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] Test step-over-{lands-on-breakpoint|trips-on-watchpoint}.exp with displaced stepping Pedro Alves
2015-04-10 14:54 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] Teach non-stop to do in-line step-overs (stop all, step, restart) Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] Factor out code to re-resume stepped thread Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] Embed the pending step-over chain in thread_info objects Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] Fix step-over-{trips-on-watchpoint|lands-on-breakpoint}.exp race Pedro Alves
2015-04-07 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/23] Make thread_still_needs_step_over consider stepping_over_watchpoint too Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 9:28 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-13 10:47 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 00/23] All-stop on top of non-stop Yao Qi
2015-04-08 10:17 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-08 10:30 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-10 8:41 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-10 8:50 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-10 8:22 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-10 8:34 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-10 9:26 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-13 15:28 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-13 16:16 ` Yao Qi
2015-04-13 16:23 ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-13 16:23 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1428410990-28560-17-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox