Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [pushed] Fix gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp race
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425497614-16522-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> (raw)

Gary stumbled on this:

 (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: all-stop: continue to end
 info threads
   Id   Target Id         Frame
 * 1    Thread 0x7ffff7fdb700 (LWP 13717) "thread-specific" end () at /home/gary/work/archer/startswith/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.c:29
 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: all-stop: thread start is gone
 info breakpoint

The problem is that "...archer/startswith/src..." has a "start" in it,
which matches the too-lax regex in the test.

Rather than tweaking the regex, we can just remove the whole "info
threads", like we removed similar ones in other files -- GDB nowadays
does this implicitly already, so things should work without it.  Thus
removing this even improves testing here a bit.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-03-04  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	* gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: Delete "info threads" test.
---
 gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog                          |  4 ++++
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp | 13 -------------
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 3f41178..6f97eda 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2015-03-04  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
+
+	* gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: Delete "info threads" test.
+
 2015-03-04  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>
 
 	* gdb.base/foll-fork.exp: Enable on *-*-openbsd*.
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp
index e167564..c4d8286 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp
@@ -91,19 +91,6 @@ proc check_thread_specific_breakpoint {mode} {
 	    "Breakpoint .* end .* at .*" \
 	    "continue to end"
 
-	# Force GDB to update the thread list.  Otherwise, depending
-	# on target, GDB may not realize that the start thread has
-	# exited and thus not remove the thread specific breakpoint.
-	set test "thread start is gone"
-	gdb_test_multiple "info threads" $test {
-	    -re "\[0-9\]+.*start.*$gdb_prompt $" {
-		fail $test
-	    }
-	    -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
-		pass $test
-	    }
-	}
-
 	set test "thread-specific breakpoint was deleted"
 	gdb_test_multiple "info breakpoint" $test {
 	    -re "thread $start_thre\n$gdb_prompt $" {
-- 
1.9.3


             reply	other threads:[~2015-03-04 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-04 19:33 Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-03-05  9:22 ` Gary Benson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1425497614-16522-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox