From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] Move code to get_traceframe_location.
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 01:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1371086914-8398-4-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371086914-8398-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>
This patch is a refactor patch. It moves some code into a new
function get_traceframe_location, which will be shared in the next
patch in this series.
gdb:
2013-06-13 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* tracepoint.c (trace_dump_command): Move code to ...
(get_traceframe_location): ... here. New.
---
gdb/tracepoint.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/tracepoint.c b/gdb/tracepoint.c
index 05f51ea..86a573e 100644
--- a/gdb/tracepoint.c
+++ b/gdb/tracepoint.c
@@ -2933,6 +2933,48 @@ trace_dump_actions (struct command_line *action,
}
}
+/* Return bp_location of the tracepoint associated with the current
+ traceframe. Set *STEPPING_FRAME_P to 1 if the current traceframe
+ is the stepping traceframe. */
+
+static struct bp_location *
+get_traceframe_location (int *stepping_frame_p)
+{
+ struct tracepoint *t;
+ struct bp_location *tloc;
+ struct regcache *regcache;
+
+ if (tracepoint_number == -1)
+ error (_("No current trace frame."));
+
+ t = get_tracepoint (tracepoint_number);
+
+ if (t == NULL)
+ error (_("No known tracepoint matches 'current' tracepoint #%d."),
+ tracepoint_number);
+
+ /* The current frame is a trap frame if the frame PC is equal to the
+ tracepoint PC. If not, then the current frame was collected
+ during single-stepping. */
+ regcache = get_current_regcache ();
+
+ /* If the traceframe's address matches any of the tracepoint's
+ locations, assume it is a direct hit rather than a while-stepping
+ frame. (FIXME this is not reliable, should record each frame's
+ type.) */
+ for (tloc = t->base.loc; tloc; tloc = tloc->next)
+ if (tloc->address == regcache_read_pc (regcache))
+ {
+ *stepping_frame_p = 0;
+ return tloc;
+ }
+
+ /* If this is a stepping frame, we don't know which location
+ triggered. The first is as good (or bad) a guess as any... */
+ *stepping_frame_p = 1;
+ return t->base.loc;
+}
+
/* Return all the actions, including default collect, of a tracepoint
T. It constructs cleanups into the chain, and leaves the caller to
handle them (call do_cleanups). */
@@ -2973,43 +3015,19 @@ all_tracepoint_actions_and_cleanup (struct breakpoint *t)
static void
trace_dump_command (char *args, int from_tty)
{
- struct regcache *regcache;
- struct tracepoint *t;
int stepping_frame = 0;
struct bp_location *loc;
- char *default_collect_line = NULL;
- struct command_line *actions, *default_collect_action = NULL;
struct cleanup *old_chain;
+ struct command_line *actions;
- if (tracepoint_number == -1)
- error (_("No current trace frame."));
-
- old_chain = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
- t = get_tracepoint (tracepoint_number);
-
- if (t == NULL)
- error (_("No known tracepoint matches 'current' tracepoint #%d."),
- tracepoint_number);
+ /* This throws an error is not inspecting a trace frame. */
+ loc = get_traceframe_location (&stepping_frame);
printf_filtered ("Data collected at tracepoint %d, trace frame %d:\n",
tracepoint_number, traceframe_number);
- /* The current frame is a trap frame if the frame PC is equal
- to the tracepoint PC. If not, then the current frame was
- collected during single-stepping. */
-
- regcache = get_current_regcache ();
-
- /* If the traceframe's address matches any of the tracepoint's
- locations, assume it is a direct hit rather than a while-stepping
- frame. (FIXME this is not reliable, should record each frame's
- type.) */
- stepping_frame = 1;
- for (loc = t->base.loc; loc; loc = loc->next)
- if (loc->address == regcache_read_pc (regcache))
- stepping_frame = 0;
-
- actions = all_tracepoint_actions_and_cleanup (&t->base);
+ old_chain = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
+ actions = all_tracepoint_actions_and_cleanup (loc->owner);
trace_dump_actions (actions, 0, stepping_frame, from_tty);
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-13 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 13:07 [PATCH 0/5] New MI command -trace-frame-collected Yao Qi
2013-06-07 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] Remove global variable tracepoint_list and stepping_list Yao Qi
2013-06-07 20:50 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-07 13:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] New MI command -trace-frame-collected Yao Qi
2013-06-07 13:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] New test: gdb.trace/mi-trace-frame-collected.exp Yao Qi
2013-06-07 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] Move code to get_traceframe_location Yao Qi
2013-06-07 21:09 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-07 13:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] Add id of TSV into traceframe_info Yao Qi
2013-06-07 14:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-06-08 11:06 ` Yao Qi
2013-06-13 1:29 ` [PATCH 0/6 V2] New MI command -trace-frame-collected Yao Qi
2013-06-13 1:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] " Yao Qi
2013-06-13 14:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-06-14 9:52 ` Yao Qi
2013-06-14 12:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-06-17 10:21 ` Yao Qi
2013-06-17 15:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-06-18 14:09 ` Yao Qi
2013-06-18 17:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-06-25 17:31 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-26 8:29 ` Yao Qi
2013-06-26 11:22 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-13 1:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] Add id of TSV into traceframe_info Yao Qi
2013-06-13 3:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-06-25 16:18 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-26 8:19 ` Yao Qi
2013-06-13 1:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] Emit error in tdump command when traceframe is not selected Yao Qi
2013-06-25 15:32 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-13 1:29 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2013-06-25 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/6] Move code to get_traceframe_location Pedro Alves
2013-06-13 1:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] New test: gdb.trace/mi-trace-frame-collected.exp Yao Qi
2013-06-25 18:42 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-26 10:32 ` Yao Qi
2013-06-13 2:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] Remove global variable tracepoint_list and stepping_list Yao Qi
2013-06-25 15:28 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-24 15:25 ` [ping]: [PATCH 0/6 V2] New MI command -trace-frame-collected Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1371086914-8398-4-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox