From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Subject: [PING][PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Fix ada tests with -fPIE/-pie
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 07:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12cc8627-17db-d52d-73cc-d352b011791c@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c79f3e7b-a5bd-b815-7dbe-a043cd1f689a@suse.de>
On 08-08-19 12:15, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 07-08-19 17:27, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 07-08-19 16:18, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes:
>>> Tom> When running the gdb testsuite with target board unix/-fPIE/-pie, the
>>> Tom> resulting ada executables are not PIE executables, because gnatmake doesn't
>>> Tom> recognize -pie, and consequently doesn't pass it to gnatlink.
>>>
>>> Tom> Fix this by replacing "-pie" with "-largs -pie -margs" for ada test-cases in
>>> Tom> gdb_default_target_compile, and doing the same for -no-pie.
>>>
>>> I think this is a good idea overall.
>>>
>>> However, is gdb_default_target_compile still used? And if so, by what
>>> path?
>> I'm using dejagnu 1.6.1, and that one does not have find_go_linker. So,
>> use_gdb_compile is set to 1 and we get:
>> ...
>> if {$use_gdb_compile} {
>> catch {rename default_target_compile {}}
>> rename gdb_default_target_compile default_target_compile
>> }
>> ...
>>
>>> My understanding is that with a "new enough" dejagnu, it won't be
>>> used -- so some users might still see the old behavior.
>>>
>> AFAIU, yes. Hmm, that's not good.
>>
>>> Basically gdb_default_target_compile is all a big monkeypatching hack
>> /me reads https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_patch
>>
>>> and it would be way better to have some kind of more principled approach
>>> upstream.
>> Agreed.
>>
>>> I don't know what that would look like. And of course to get
>>> there we'd probably need even more monkeypatching.
>> The following uses the approach taken in lib/cell.exp.
>>
>> Is this any better?
>>
> Updated rationale and ChangeLog entry.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
Ping.
Thanks,
- Tom
> 0001-gdb-testsuite-Fix-ada-tests-with-fPIE-pie.patch
>
> [gdb/testsuite] Fix ada tests with -fPIE/-pie
>
> When running the gdb testsuite with target board unix/-fPIE/-pie, the
> resulting ada executables are not PIE executables, because gnatmake doesn't
> recognize -pie, and consequently doesn't pass it to gnatlink.
>
> Fix this by replacing "-pie" with "-largs -pie -margs" in
> target_compile_ada_from_dir, and doing the same for -no-pie.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2019-08-08 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
>
> PR testsuite/24888
> * lib/ada.exp (target_compile_ada_from_dir): Route -pie/-no-pie to
> gnatlink.
>
> ---
> gdb/testsuite/lib/ada.exp | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/ada.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/ada.exp
> index 1345c747c5..6a3fd33240 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/ada.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/ada.exp
> @@ -19,11 +19,36 @@
>
> proc target_compile_ada_from_dir {builddir source dest type options} {
> set saved_cwd [pwd]
> +
> + global board
> + set board [target_info name]
> + set save_multilib_flag [board_info $board multilib_flags]
> + set multilib_flag ""
> + foreach op $save_multilib_flag {
> + if { $op == "-pie" || $op == "-no-pie" } {
> + # Pretend gnatmake supports -pie/-no-pie, route it to
> + # linker.
> + append multilib_flag " -largs $op -margs"
> + } else {
> + append multilib_flag " $op"
> + }
> + }
> + if { $multilib_flag != "" } {
> + unset_board_info "multilib_flags"
> + set_board_info multilib_flags "$multilib_flag"
> + }
> +
> catch {
> cd $builddir
> return [target_compile $source $dest $type $options]
> } result options
> cd $saved_cwd
> +
> + if { $save_multilib_flag != "" } {
> + unset_board_info "multilib_flags"
> + set_board_info multilib_flags $save_multilib_flag
> + }
> +
> return -options $options $result
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-21 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 11:07 [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] " Tom de Vries
2019-08-07 14:18 ` Tom Tromey
2019-08-07 15:27 ` Tom de Vries
2019-08-08 10:15 ` Tom de Vries
2019-08-21 7:15 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2019-08-28 7:18 ` [PING^2][PATCH][gdb/testsuite] " Tom de Vries
2019-09-04 8:17 ` [PING^3][PATCH][gdb/testsuite] " Tom de Vries
2019-09-13 19:47 ` [PING^4][PATCH][gdb/testsuite] " Tom de Vries
2019-10-09 14:49 ` [PING][PATCH][gdb/testsuite] " Tom Tromey
2019-10-10 14:03 ` [gdb/testsuite] Compile ada with -lgnarl_pic and -lgnat_pic if required Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12cc8627-17db-d52d-73cc-d352b011791c@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox