From: Danny Backx <danny.backx@scarlet.be>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com,
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Build question
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1252766961.8804.38.camel@pavilion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909111622.34265.pedro@codesourcery.com>
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 16:22 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Friday 11 September 2009 15:42:53, Danny Backx wrote:
> > Question : it looks like breaking a gdb-gdbserver session always kills
> > the inferior. Or at least it does so on my target. Has this been subject
> > of research yet ? I would expect it to be possible to detach without
> > killing the inferior, much like you can when debugging a linux process
> > from a linux gdb.
>
> What do you mean by breaking, and what do you mean by
> detaching? Please be specific.
Good question :-) Turns out I had not analysed my question sufficiently
before sending this mail.
What I was looking for is for gdbserver (and the inferior) to linger
after disconnecting gdb-gdbserver, until I reconnect to it with maybe
another gdb session.
Maybe my question is a bit too funky.
> Neither DebugActiveProcessStop nor DebugSetProcessKillOnExit were support
> by Windows CE up until version 5. I see that DebugActiveProcessStop
> was added to CE 6.0:
> Try checking if DebugActiveProcessStop is non-NULL here on
> your CE >= 6.0 device, and tweak this code to make it possible to detach
> with DebugActiveProcessStop even if we don't support
> DebugSetProcessKillOnExit.
>
> (In fact, I don't understand why DebugSetProcessKillOnExit is
> needed here. does Windows really kill a detached inferior when
> gdbserver exits _after_having_detached_from_it_?)
No, I don't see that. FYI see two examples below, both show both the gdb
and gdbserver session (they're on my screen in two xterms).
Scenario 1 : detach gdb (from gdbserver)
-> gdbserver appears to detach from inferior
-> gdbserver terminates
-> inferior continues to run
(gdb) target remote ebox:9999
Remote debugging using ebox:9999
(gdb) detach
Ending remote debugging.
(gdb)
\network\x86> gdbserver :9999 /network/x86/usedemo.exe
Process /network/x86/usedemo.exe created; pid = 88473610
Listening on port 9999
Remote debugging from host 172.17.1.10
Detaching from process 88473610
\network\x86> In main
Message from DLL
After DLL call
Scenario 2 : quit gdb
-> gdb tells gdbserver to terminate inferior
-> gdbserver terminates inferior
-> gdbserver terminates
(gdb) target remote ebox:9999
Remote debugging using ebox:9999
(gdb) q
A debugging session is active.
Inferior 1 [Remote target] will be killed.
Quit anyway? (y or n) y
\network\x86> gdbserver :9999 /network/x86/usedemo.exe
Process /network/x86/usedemo.exe created; pid = 92536842
Listening on port 9999
Remote debugging from host 172.17.1.10
Killing all inferiors
\network\x86>
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-12 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1250803105.11282.96.camel@pavilion>
[not found] ` <m3fxbl2jib.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <83d46pgjkq.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <1250877901.11282.116.camel@pavilion>
[not found] ` <83ab1tgh9h.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <1250880746.11282.128.camel@pavilion>
[not found] ` <m3r5v425lu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1250931899.11282.142.camel@pavilion>
[not found] ` <83skfkfa4n.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <1251095160.16357.352.camel@pavilion>
[not found] ` <1251828295.6106.119.camel@pavilion>
[not found] ` <83zl9e8nro.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <1251835928.6106.124.camel@pavilion>
[not found] ` <83vdk281xb.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <1252143311.6106.252.camel@pavilion>
2009-09-05 16:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-07 22:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-08 15:53 ` Danny Backx
2009-09-08 20:13 ` Danny Backx
2009-09-09 19:57 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 14:41 ` Danny Backx
2009-09-11 15:22 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-11 15:28 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-12 14:48 ` Danny Backx [this message]
2009-09-12 15:03 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-12 16:58 ` Danny Backx
2009-09-13 16:10 ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-13 18:07 ` Danny Backx
2009-09-12 14:53 ` Danny Backx
2009-09-13 9:30 ` Danny Backx
2009-09-13 16:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-14 18:03 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-14 18:25 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1252766961.8804.38.camel@pavilion \
--to=danny.backx@scarlet.be \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox