Re: [PATCH 1/4] catch syscall -- try 4 -- Architecture-independent part

["Sérgio Durigan Júnior" <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:35 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:29:33PM -0300, Sérgio Durigan Júnior wrote:
> > So this is my opinion about this: I have the complete catch syscall
> > patch here (the only thing that's missing is the MI support), so what do
> > you think if we just push this patch upstream as-is (which is: in a
> > pretty good shape, as far as I understood the others developers' --
> > including yours -- comments), and postpone this MI support? I think I
> > should be able to sit down and implement this support until the end of
> > this semester, is it good for you?
> 
> Yes, that's fine.  If someone else needs it, they'll fill it in.

Thank you very much, Daniel. I'll prepare the patch for resubmission as
soon as I get some free time here :-).

Regards,

-- 
Sérgio Durigan Júnior
Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - LTC
IBM Brazil