From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32064 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2009 20:21:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 32055 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Apr 2009 20:21:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp05.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp05.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:21:10 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by e24smtp05.br.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n39KH1JE002355 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:17:01 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n39LKP3E3588158 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:20:25 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n39KKgMs009980 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:21:04 -0300 Received: from [9.8.7.2] ([9.8.7.2]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n39KKe2w009951; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:20:40 -0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] catch syscall -- try 4 -- Architecture-independent part From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Durigan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FAnior?= To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20090409193556.GA27633@caradoc.them.org> References: <1232929831.26873.22.camel@miki> <200901260053.06295.pedro@codesourcery.com> <1232945747.26873.27.camel@miki> <1232989355.26873.39.camel@miki> <20090201193306.GJ4597@caradoc.them.org> <1235561189.14363.20.camel@miki> <20090227221133.GA12904@caradoc.them.org> <1238352626.23609.14.camel@miki> <20090331154452.GA13260@caradoc.them.org> <1239305373.6452.13.camel@miki> <20090409193556.GA27633@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:21:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1239308439.6452.14.camel@miki> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:35 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:29:33PM -0300, Sérgio Durigan Júnior wrote: > > So this is my opinion about this: I have the complete catch syscall > > patch here (the only thing that's missing is the MI support), so what do > > you think if we just push this patch upstream as-is (which is: in a > > pretty good shape, as far as I understood the others developers' -- > > including yours -- comments), and postpone this MI support? I think I > > should be able to sit down and implement this support until the end of > > this semester, is it good for you? > > Yes, that's fine. If someone else needs it, they'll fill it in. Thank you very much, Daniel. I'll prepare the patch for resubmission as soon as I get some free time here :-). Regards, -- Sérgio Durigan Júnior Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - LTC IBM Brazil