[rfa] doc/gdbint.texinfo: remove reference to REG_STACK_SEGMENT

[rfa] doc/gdbint.texinfo: remove reference to REG_STACK_SEGMENT

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

This removes another dead symbol from "Obsolete Conditionals"
in gdbint.texinfo.  The symbol is REG_STACK_SEGMENT.  It was last used
in the Pyramid code in gdb 4.18.

After this patch, "Obsolete Conditionals" has only one symbol left,
but that symbol is still in use.

OK to apply?

Michael C

2002-04-12  Michael Chastain  <mec@shout.net>

	* gdbint.texinfo (Obsolete Conditionals): Remove reference to
	REG_STACK_SEGMENT.

Index: gdbint.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.73
diff -c -3 -p -r1.73 gdbint.texinfo
*** gdbint.texinfo	10 Apr 2002 05:11:35 -0000	1.73
--- gdbint.texinfo	12 Apr 2002 22:37:26 -0000
*************** and deleted from all of @value{GDBN}'s c
*** 5728,5736 ****
  Any @file{@var{foo}-xdep.c} file that references STACK_END_ADDR
  is so old that it has never been converted to use BFD.  Now that's old!
  
- @item REG_STACK_SEGMENT
- exec.c
- 
  @end table
  
  @include fdl.texi
--- 5728,5733 ----

Re: [rfa] doc/gdbint.texinfo: remove reference to REG_STACK_SEGMENT

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:38:55 -0500
> From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
> 
> This removes another dead symbol from "Obsolete Conditionals"
> in gdbint.texinfo.  The symbol is REG_STACK_SEGMENT.  It was last used
> in the Pyramid code in gdb 4.18.
> 
> After this patch, "Obsolete Conditionals" has only one symbol left,
> but that symbol is still in use.
> 
> OK to apply?

Yes, thanks.

Re: [rfa] doc/gdbint.texinfo: remove reference to REG_STACK_SEGMENT

[Andrew Cagney]

> This removes another dead symbol from "Obsolete Conditionals"
> in gdbint.texinfo.  The symbol is REG_STACK_SEGMENT.  It was last used
> in the Pyramid code in gdb 4.18.
> 
> After this patch, "Obsolete Conditionals" has only one symbol left,
> but that symbol is still in use.

BTW, I think the other conditional (STACK_END_ADDR) can go as well.  It 
doesn't appear in any core-gdb code yet many targets define it.  A few 
targets just happen to a very similar sounding macro it as a local constant.

Andrew