From: Luis Machado <luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH] Watchpoints + conditionals problem
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1196272755.15925.11.camel@gargoyle> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 944 bytes --]
Hi folks,
There is an unexpected behavior when we use software watchpoints (also
hardware in some cases) attached to conditional expressions, such as:
"watch x if x == <number>", considering "x" a simple "int" type
variable.
When that watchpoint goes out of scope, it's marked for disposal at the
next stop as obviously there's no way to evaluate the expression "x"
anymore. But GDB is still trying to evaluate the conditional part of the
watchpoint, even though "x" is out of scope already. Thus, GDB is
failing to find correct frame information and ends up in an internal
error.
I've tracked down this issue and it seems we need to check for the
disposition field of the watchpoint whenever we check for the return
value of a conditional expression.
Attached is a simple patch of what i have in mind to fix this issue. The
testcase can be a simple "Hello world"-like binary with a few variables
to watch.
Any other ideas?
Regards,
Luis
[-- Attachment #2: watch_condition_fix.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 555 bytes --]
Index: gdb/breakpoint.c
===================================================================
--- gdb.orig/breakpoint.c 2007-11-28 09:47:26.000000000 -0800
+++ gdb/breakpoint.c 2007-11-28 09:49:47.000000000 -0800
@@ -2969,7 +2969,7 @@
if (b->type == bp_watchpoint_scope)
b->related_breakpoint->watchpoint_triggered = watch_triggered_yes;
- if (bl->cond)
+ if (bl->cond && bl->owner->disposition != disp_del_at_next_stop)
{
/* Need to select the frame, with all that implies
so that the conditions will have the right context. */
next reply other threads:[~2007-11-28 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-28 17:59 Luis Machado [this message]
2007-11-29 8:54 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-29 12:06 ` Luis Machado
2007-12-16 21:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-17 11:35 ` Luis Machado
2007-12-17 12:36 ` Luis Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1196272755.15925.11.camel@gargoyle \
--to=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox