[RFA] annota1.exp: Don't require complete pathname in info break test

[RFA] annota1.exp: Don't require complete pathname in info break test

[Kevin Buettner]

While testing with the IRIX compiler, I found it necessary to make the
change below in order for the test to pass.  I think it's reasonable for
this test to still pass even if the pathname in question isn't completely
qualified.

Okay to commit?

	* gdb.base/annota1.exp (info break): Make directory components of
	path optional since not all compilers emit this debug information.

Index: testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 annota1.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp	18 Apr 2002 22:17:01 -0000	1.10
+++ testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp	29 Jul 2002 20:37:59 -0000
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ gdb_expect {
 #
 send_gdb "info break\n" 
 gdb_expect {
- -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-headers\r\n\r\n\032\032field 0\r\nNum \r\n\032\032field 1\r\nType           \r\n\032\032field 2\r\nDisp \r\n\032\032field 3\r\nEnb \r\n\032\032field 4\r\nAddress    +\r\n\032\032field 5\r\nWhat\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-table\r\n\r\n\032\032record\r\n\r\n\032\032field 0\r\n1   \r\n\032\032field 1\r\nbreakpoint     \r\n\032\032field 2\r\nkeep \r\n\032\032field 3\r\ny   \r\n\032\032field 4\r\n$hex +\r\n\032\032field 5\r\nin main at ${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}:$main_line\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-table-end\r\n$gdb_prompt$" \
+ -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-headers\r\n\r\n\032\032field 0\r\nNum \r\n\032\032field 1\r\nType           \r\n\032\032field 2\r\nDisp \r\n\032\032field 3\r\nEnb \r\n\032\032field 4\r\nAddress    +\r\n\032\032field 5\r\nWhat\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-table\r\n\r\n\032\032record\r\n\r\n\032\032field 0\r\n1   \r\n\032\032field 1\r\nbreakpoint     \r\n\032\032field 2\r\nkeep \r\n\032\032field 3\r\ny   \r\n\032\032field 4\r\n$hex +\r\n\032\032field 5\r\nin main at (${srcdir}/${subdir}/)?${srcfile}:$main_line\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-table-end\r\n$gdb_prompt$" \
 	{pass "breakpoint info"}
    -re ".*$gdb_prompt$" { fail "breakpoint info" }
    timeout { fail "breakpoint info (timeout)" }

Re: [RFA] annota1.exp: Don't require complete pathname in info break test

[Fernando Nasser]

I guess we can't require something that may not be there.

Pls. check it in.

Regards,
Fernando

Kevin Buettner wrote:
> While testing with the IRIX compiler, I found it necessary to make the
> change below in order for the test to pass.  I think it's reasonable for
> this test to still pass even if the pathname in question isn't completely
> qualified.
> 
> Okay to commit?
> 
> 	* gdb.base/annota1.exp (info break): Make directory components of
> 	path optional since not all compilers emit this debug information.
> 
> Index: testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp,v
> retrieving revision 1.10
> diff -u -p -r1.10 annota1.exp
> --- testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp	18 Apr 2002 22:17:01 -0000	1.10
> +++ testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp	29 Jul 2002 20:37:59 -0000
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ gdb_expect {
>  #
>  send_gdb "info break\n" 
>  gdb_expect {
> - -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-headers\r\n\r\n\032\032field 0\r\nNum \r\n\032\032field 1\r\nType           \r\n\032\032field 2\r\nDisp \r\n\032\032field 3\r\nEnb \r\n\032\032field 4\r\nAddress    +\r\n\032\032field 5\r\nWhat\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-table\r\n\r\n\032\032record\r\n\r\n\032\032field 0\r\n1   \r\n\032\032field 1\r\nbreakpoint     \r\n\032\032field 2\r\nkeep \r\n\032\032field 3\r\ny   \r\n\032\032field 4\r\n$hex +\r\n\032\032field 5\r\nin main at ${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}:$main_line\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-table-end\r\n$gdb_prompt$" \
> + -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-headers\r\n\r\n\032\032field 0\r\nNum \r\n\032\032field 1\r\nType           \r\n\032\032field 2\r\nDisp \r\n\032\032field 3\r\nEnb \r\n\032\032field 4\r\nAddress    +\r\n\032\032field 5\r\nWhat\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-table\r\n\r\n\032\032record\r\n\r\n\032\032field 0\r\n1   \r\n\032\032field 1\r\nbreakpoint     \r\n\032\032field 2\r\nkeep \r\n\032\032field 3\r\ny   \r\n\032\032field 4\r\n$hex +\r\n\032\032field 5\r\nin main at (${srcdir}/${subdir}/)?${srcfile}:$main_line\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-table-end\r\n$gdb_prompt$" \
>  	{pass "breakpoint info"}
>     -re ".*$gdb_prompt$" { fail "breakpoint info" }
>     timeout { fail "breakpoint info (timeout)" }
> 



-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9

Re: [RFA] annota1.exp: Don't require complete pathname in info break test

[Kevin Buettner]

On Sep 25,  2:28pm, Fernando Nasser wrote:

> I guess we can't require something that may not be there.
> 
> Pls. check it in.

Committed.

Kevin