From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Handle 64bit breakpoints of WOW64 processes as SIGINT
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:30:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ce3a433-4256-93e9-8843-57cd5f28ba73@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200923172122.2089-1-ssbssa@yahoo.de>
On 2020-09-23 1:21 p.m., Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches wrote:
> When a WOW64 process triggers a breakpoint exception in 64bit code (which
> happens when a 64bit gdb calls DebugBreakProcess for a 32bit target),
> gdb ignores the breakpoint (because Wow64GetThreadContext can only report
> the pc of 32bit code, and there is not int3 at this location).
>
> But if these 64bit breakpoint exceptions are handled as SIGINT, gdb
> doesn't check for int3, and always stops the target.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2020-09-23 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
>
> * nat/windows-nat.c (handle_exception): Handle 64bit breakpoints
> in WOW64 processes as SIGINT.
> * nat/windows-nat.h: Make wow64_process a shared variable.
> * windows-nat.c: Remove static wow64_process variable.
>
> gdbserver/ChangeLog:
>
> 2020-09-23 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
>
> * win32-low.cc: Remove local wow64_process variable.
> * win32-low.h: Remove local wow64_process variable.
This is ok, but...
> @@ -240,6 +241,13 @@ handle_exception (struct target_waitstatus *ourstatus, bool debug_exceptions)
> ourstatus->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_SPURIOUS;
> ignore_first_breakpoint = false;
> }
> + else if (wow64_process)
> + {
> + DEBUG_EXCEPTION_SIMPLE ("EXCEPTION_BREAKPOINT");
> + rec->ExceptionCode = DBG_CONTROL_C;
> + ourstatus->value.sig = GDB_SIGNAL_INT;
> + break;
> + }
...please add a comment here saying why this particular handling exists,
it's really not intuitive.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-24 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200923172122.2089-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de>
2020-09-23 17:21 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
2020-09-23 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "Fix ctrl-c when debugging WOW64 processes" Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
2020-09-23 17:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] Remove call of GenerateConsoleCtrlEvent Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
2020-09-24 3:35 ` Simon Marchi
2020-09-24 14:40 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-09-24 15:01 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
2020-09-24 3:30 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2020-09-24 15:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] Handle 64bit breakpoints of WOW64 processes as SIGINT Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
2020-09-24 15:29 ` Simon Marchi
2020-09-24 16:37 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
2020-09-24 16:42 ` Simon Marchi
2020-09-24 17:05 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
2020-09-24 17:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-09-24 17:51 ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ce3a433-4256-93e9-8843-57cd5f28ba73@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=ssbssa@yahoo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox