Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>,
	Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Reset Windows hardware breakpoints on executable's entry point
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 16:54:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <033665b4-d036-83a6-2a31-88bccb802612@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <262511602.870722.1590593988931@mail.yahoo.com>

On 5/27/20 4:39 PM, Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches wrote:
>  Am Mittwoch, 27. Mai 2020, 16:48:16 MESZ hat Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> Folgendes geschrieben:

>> The answer at <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5925542/how-can-i-set-break-point-on-my-function-and-list-its-source>,
>> seems to confirm it:
>>
>>    "If you debugger sets some registry values right now, those changes would not
>>      matter, because OS will override all register values while starting executing
>>      process. "
>>
>> Interestingly, it also says:
>>
>>    "Workaround is simple -- first make a single step using t instruction, then you
>>      can use hardware breakpoints as you like."
>>
>> Which makes it sounds like a single-step is all it takes to get to the entry point.
>> That may make it easier to implement this inside do_initial_windows_stuff,
>> including doing the same thing in gdbserver.
> 
> I just tried:

...

> So after a nexti the hardware breakpoint still didn't work, because at this
> point it's far before the overwriting of the context.
> 

OK, thanks for trying it out.

> Or did you mean this different?

No, I was misled by the comments in stackoverflow, which are clearly incorrect.

Meanwhile I found this, which explains this mechanism in more detail:

 http://www.nynaeve.net/?p=81

> Anyways, since there is a simple workaround to make the hardware breakpoints
> work (just use "start"), it doesn't matter much to me if this gets fixed.
I think that it's nice to make this work transparently; I was just
exploring the best way to do so.  Let me take another look at the patch.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves



  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-31 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200525185659.59346-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de>
2020-05-25 18:56 ` Windows testsuite failures Hannes Domani
2020-05-25 18:56   ` [PATCH 1/7] Fix function argument and return value locations Hannes Domani
2020-05-25 21:02     ` Simon Marchi
2020-05-25 21:32       ` Hannes Domani
2020-05-25 22:14         ` Simon Marchi
2020-05-25 23:03           ` Hannes Domani
2020-05-26 16:14             ` Simon Marchi
2020-05-26 20:43         ` Tom Tromey
2020-05-25 18:56   ` [PATCH 2/7] Handle Windows drives in auto-load script paths Hannes Domani
2020-05-26 16:04     ` Jon Turney
2020-05-26 16:31       ` Hannes Domani
2020-05-26 16:05     ` Christian Biesinger
2020-05-26 16:25       ` Hannes Domani
2020-05-26 16:31         ` Christian Biesinger
2020-05-26 16:40           ` Hannes Domani
2020-05-26 16:42             ` Christian Biesinger
2020-05-26 17:14               ` Hannes Domani
2020-05-25 18:56   ` [PATCH 3/7] Handle Windows drives in rbreak paths Hannes Domani
2020-05-25 18:56   ` [PATCH 4/7] Use errno value of first openp failure Hannes Domani
2020-05-26 20:37     ` Tom Tromey
2020-05-25 18:56   ` [PATCH 5/7] Close file handle of empty history file Hannes Domani
2020-05-26 16:37     ` Christian Biesinger
2020-05-26 17:42       ` Hannes Domani
2020-05-27 14:33         ` Tom Tromey
2020-05-27 17:37           ` Hannes Domani
2020-05-27 18:27             ` Christian Biesinger
2020-05-25 18:56   ` [PATCH 6/7] Move exit_status_set_internal_vars out of GLOBAL_CURDIR Hannes Domani
2020-05-26 20:45     ` Tom Tromey
2020-05-27 17:50       ` Hannes Domani
2020-05-25 18:56   ` [PATCH 7/7] Reset Windows hardware breakpoints on executable's entry point Hannes Domani
2020-05-27 12:07     ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-27 14:48       ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-27 15:39         ` Hannes Domani
2020-05-31 15:54           ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2020-05-31 16:37     ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-07 12:56       ` Hannes Domani
2020-07-08 17:43         ` Hannes Domani
2020-10-09 18:22         ` Pedro Alves
2020-10-09 18:51           ` Hannes Domani via Gdb-patches
2020-10-12 11:13             ` Pedro Alves
2020-10-12 17:21       ` Tom Tromey
2020-10-12 17:22         ` Tom Tromey
2020-05-28 18:15   ` Windows testsuite failures Christian Biesinger
2020-05-28 18:37     ` Hannes Domani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=033665b4-d036-83a6-2a31-88bccb802612@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ssbssa@yahoo.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox