Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/sparc] pb doing next over struct-return function
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c4d14f$Blat.v2.2.2$de142420@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200411230833.iAN8X6Ru027549@juw15.nfra.nl> (message from Mark Kettenis on Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:33:06 +0100 (CET))

> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:33:06 +0100 (CET)
> From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Return non-zero if the instruction at PC is an "unimp" instruction.
>        ^^^^^^^^                              ^
> 
>    +  else
>    +    {
>    +      /* There is no debugging information for this function to
>    +         help us determine whether this function returns a struct
>    +         or not.  So we rely on another heuristic which is to check
>    +         the instruction at the return address and see if this is
>    +         a "unimp" instruction.  If it is, then it is struct-return
>    +         function.  */
> 
> an "unimp" instruction.
>  ^                                           ^

Really?  I'm not a native English speaker, but I think "a unimp" is
correct.  It's like "a university", isn't it?

Perhaps "the unimp instruction" would be better, though, since it's a
name of a specific instruction.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-23 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-23  5:35 Joel Brobecker
2004-11-23  8:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-23 11:33   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-11-23 12:06     ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-11-23 19:57     ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-11-23 19:29   ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01c4d14f$Blat.v2.2.2$de142420@zahav.net.il' \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kettenis@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox