RE: [RFA] Handle BINOP_INTDIV in valarith.c

["Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>]

 I would like to have some feedback from the other languages that
seem to also use BINOP_INTDIV.
 
  Furthermore, my patch is incomplete,
I forgot the eval.c part that is required:

I send here a minimal patch to
allow to get a 'print 13 div 3' to return '4'

  Does this patch work for fortran, ada, modula-2?
I suspect that the type checking is not appropriate for
most of these languages:
Boolean types are not considered as ordinals
in pascal, and probably also not in the languages
cited above.
  For pascal, 'print 13 div true'
as well as print 12 + true'
should not be allowed, but it is now...

  Is this OK?
  
ChangeLog entry:

2008-01-21  Pierre Muller  <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>

	* eval.c (evaluate_subexp_standard): Support
	BINOP_INTDIV opcode.


Index: gdb/eval.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/eval.c,v
retrieving revision 1.77
diff -u -p -r1.77 eval.c
--- gdb/eval.c  18 Jan 2008 17:07:39 -0000      1.77
+++ gdb/eval.c  21 Jan 2008 14:55:45 -0000
@@ -1496,6 +1496,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
     case BINOP_EXP:
     case BINOP_MUL:
     case BINOP_DIV:
+    case BINOP_INTDIV:
     case BINOP_REM:
     case BINOP_MOD:
     case BINOP_LSH:
@@ -1510,7 +1511,8 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
       if (binop_user_defined_p (op, arg1, arg2))
        return value_x_binop (arg1, arg2, op, OP_NULL, noside);
       else if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS
-              && (op == BINOP_DIV || op == BINOP_REM || op == BINOP_MOD))
+              && (op == BINOP_DIV || op == BINOP_REM || op == BINOP_MOD
+                  || op == BINOP_INTDIV))
        return value_zero (value_type (arg1), not_lval);
       else
        return value_binop (arg1, arg2, op);