* [djgpp/commit] Update list of Windows versions of the NT family.
@ 2009-04-17 12:01 Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-17 12:16 ` Pierre Muller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2009-04-17 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
I committed a patch that updates the possible Windows versions that
disguise themselves as DOS 5.5.
2009-04-17 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
* go32-nat.c (go32_sysinfo): Update list of Windows versions of
the NT family.
Index: gdb/go32-nat.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/go32-nat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -r1.68 go32-nat.c
--- gdb/go32-nat.c 11 Apr 2009 17:57:34 -0000 1.68
+++ gdb/go32-nat.c 17 Apr 2009 11:58:52 -0000
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@
printf_filtered ("%s)\n", windows_flavor);
}
else if (true_dos_version == 0x532 && advertized_dos_version == 0x500)
- printf_filtered ("Windows Version................Windows NT or Windows 2000\n");
+ printf_filtered ("Windows Version................Windows NT family (W2K/XP/W2K3/Vista/W2K8)\n");
puts_filtered ("\n");
if (dpmi_vendor_available == 0)
{
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* RE: [djgpp/commit] Update list of Windows versions of the NT family.
2009-04-17 12:01 [djgpp/commit] Update list of Windows versions of the NT family Eli Zaretskii
@ 2009-04-17 12:16 ` Pierre Muller
2009-04-17 15:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pierre Muller @ 2009-04-17 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Eli Zaretskii'; +Cc: gdb-patches
Shouldn't you also put NT itself in the list
in the braces?
Pierre
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Eli Zaretskii
> Envoyé : Friday, April 17, 2009 2:02 PM
> À : gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet : [djgpp/commit] Update list of Windows versions of the NT
> family.
>
> I committed a patch that updates the possible Windows versions that
> disguise themselves as DOS 5.5.
>
> 2009-04-17 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>
> * go32-nat.c (go32_sysinfo): Update list of Windows versions of
> the NT family.
>
> Index: gdb/go32-nat.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/go32-nat.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.68
> diff -u -r1.68 go32-nat.c
> --- gdb/go32-nat.c 11 Apr 2009 17:57:34 -0000 1.68
> +++ gdb/go32-nat.c 17 Apr 2009 11:58:52 -0000
> @@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@
> printf_filtered ("%s)\n", windows_flavor);
> }
> else if (true_dos_version == 0x532 && advertized_dos_version ==
> 0x500)
> - printf_filtered ("Windows Version................Windows NT or
> Windows 2000\n");
> + printf_filtered ("Windows Version................Windows NT family
> (W2K/XP/W2K3/Vista/W2K8)\n");
> puts_filtered ("\n");
> if (dpmi_vendor_available == 0)
> {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [djgpp/commit] Update list of Windows versions of the NT family.
2009-04-17 12:16 ` Pierre Muller
@ 2009-04-17 15:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2009-04-17 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pierre Muller; +Cc: gdb-patches
> From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
> Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:16:30 +0200
>
> Shouldn't you also put NT itself in the list
> in the braces?
"NT" is already mentioned, albeit as the name of the family, and the
amount of space I have there is limited. Besides, I can hardly
imagine someone use DJGPP on NT these days.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-17 15:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-17 12:01 [djgpp/commit] Update list of Windows versions of the NT family Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-17 12:16 ` Pierre Muller
2009-04-17 15:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox