* Re: General question about this list here
@ 1999-04-01 0:00 Robert Hoehne
1999-01-26 12:21 ` Robert Hoehne
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Hoehne @ 1999-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stan Shebs; +Cc: gdb-patches
>I've been encouraging our maintainers to send back an ack and to cc
>the list, so that everyone will know what's going on. In general,
>if you don't hear back, you should assume that the patch has not
>been applied yet. In your case, the large patches will need a
>copyright assignment, which I'm guessing hasn't happened yet?
Thanks for the info. About the copyright assignment:
I did this already a long time ago, but when I remember
correct, I got no response. It might be lost, so I sent it
today again.
Robert
******************************************************
* email: Robert Hoehne <robert.hoehne@gmx.net> *
* Post: Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW: http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho *
******************************************************
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: General question about this list here
1999-04-01 0:00 General question about this list here Robert Hoehne
@ 1999-01-26 12:21 ` Robert Hoehne
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Hoehne @ 1999-01-26 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stan Shebs; +Cc: gdb-patches
>I've been encouraging our maintainers to send back an ack and to cc
>the list, so that everyone will know what's going on. In general,
>if you don't hear back, you should assume that the patch has not
>been applied yet. In your case, the large patches will need a
>copyright assignment, which I'm guessing hasn't happened yet?
Thanks for the info. About the copyright assignment:
I did this already a long time ago, but when I remember
correct, I got no response. It might be lost, so I sent it
today again.
Robert
******************************************************
* email: Robert Hoehne <robert.hoehne@gmx.net> *
* Post: Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW: http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho *
******************************************************
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* General question about this list here
@ 1999-04-01 0:00 Robert Hoehne
1999-01-22 14:15 ` Robert Hoehne
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Stan Shebs
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Hoehne @ 1999-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GDB PATCH
Hi all,
Since I subscribed to that list here only some
days ago, I'm not so familar with it and I have some
question.
I have sent now some time ago some patches
here. How long does it take by default to get a positive or
negative response or, what should I assume, if
I get no answer. Should I assume, that the patch
will be applied if the gdb maintainer will have the
time to do it or should I assume that the patch will
not be applied?
Please do not understand me wrong. I know that
maintaining such a large package like gdb is not
a trivial job and that it is very time consuming. I simply
want to know, if I have still have to wait or not.
Maybe it might be also good, to place the information
I might get as answer to my questions here to the
web-page, where the gdb-patches mailing list is described
and so others, who might have the same questions will
find the answer already there.
Robert
******************************************************
* email: Robert Hoehne <robert.hoehne@gmx.net> *
* Post: Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW: http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho *
******************************************************
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* General question about this list here
1999-04-01 0:00 Robert Hoehne
@ 1999-01-22 14:15 ` Robert Hoehne
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Stan Shebs
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Hoehne @ 1999-01-22 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GDB PATCH
Hi all,
Since I subscribed to that list here only some
days ago, I'm not so familar with it and I have some
question.
I have sent now some time ago some patches
here. How long does it take by default to get a positive or
negative response or, what should I assume, if
I get no answer. Should I assume, that the patch
will be applied if the gdb maintainer will have the
time to do it or should I assume that the patch will
not be applied?
Please do not understand me wrong. I know that
maintaining such a large package like gdb is not
a trivial job and that it is very time consuming. I simply
want to know, if I have still have to wait or not.
Maybe it might be also good, to place the information
I might get as answer to my questions here to the
web-page, where the gdb-patches mailing list is described
and so others, who might have the same questions will
find the answer already there.
Robert
******************************************************
* email: Robert Hoehne <robert.hoehne@gmx.net> *
* Post: Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW: http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho *
******************************************************
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: General question about this list here
1999-04-01 0:00 Robert Hoehne
1999-01-22 14:15 ` Robert Hoehne
@ 1999-04-01 0:00 ` Stan Shebs
1999-01-22 17:55 ` Stan Shebs
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stan Shebs @ 1999-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robert.hoehne; +Cc: gdb-patches
From: Robert Hoehne <robert.hoehne@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 22:33:44 -0100
I have sent now some time ago some patches
here. How long does it take by default to get a positive or
negative response or, what should I assume, if
I get no answer. Should I assume, that the patch
will be applied if the gdb maintainer will have the
time to do it or should I assume that the patch will
not be applied?
I've been encouraging our maintainers to send back an ack and to cc
the list, so that everyone will know what's going on. In general,
if you don't hear back, you should assume that the patch has not
been applied yet. In your case, the large patches will need a
copyright assignment, which I'm guessing hasn't happened yet?
Please do not understand me wrong. I know that
maintaining such a large package like gdb is not
a trivial job and that it is very time consuming. I simply
want to know, if I have still have to wait or not.
We should be more responsive than we have been. I know that our net
contributors work hard on their code to get it into shape to be added
to GDB, and the least we can do is to look at it and respond. There's
no good reason why we can't respond within a week of the submission.
Maybe it might be also good, to place the information
I might get as answer to my questions here to the
web-page, where the gdb-patches mailing list is described
and so others, who might have the same questions will
find the answer already there.
One of my current projects is to improve our net responsiveness and
interaction, and a new web page will be included, most likely on
sourceware.cygnus.com.
Stan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: General question about this list here
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Stan Shebs
@ 1999-01-22 17:55 ` Stan Shebs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stan Shebs @ 1999-01-22 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robert.hoehne; +Cc: gdb-patches
From: Robert Hoehne <robert.hoehne@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 22:33:44 -0100
I have sent now some time ago some patches
here. How long does it take by default to get a positive or
negative response or, what should I assume, if
I get no answer. Should I assume, that the patch
will be applied if the gdb maintainer will have the
time to do it or should I assume that the patch will
not be applied?
I've been encouraging our maintainers to send back an ack and to cc
the list, so that everyone will know what's going on. In general,
if you don't hear back, you should assume that the patch has not
been applied yet. In your case, the large patches will need a
copyright assignment, which I'm guessing hasn't happened yet?
Please do not understand me wrong. I know that
maintaining such a large package like gdb is not
a trivial job and that it is very time consuming. I simply
want to know, if I have still have to wait or not.
We should be more responsive than we have been. I know that our net
contributors work hard on their code to get it into shape to be added
to GDB, and the least we can do is to look at it and respond. There's
no good reason why we can't respond within a week of the submission.
Maybe it might be also good, to place the information
I might get as answer to my questions here to the
web-page, where the gdb-patches mailing list is described
and so others, who might have the same questions will
find the answer already there.
One of my current projects is to improve our net responsiveness and
interaction, and a new web page will be included, most likely on
sourceware.cygnus.com.
Stan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-04-01 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-04-01 0:00 General question about this list here Robert Hoehne
1999-01-26 12:21 ` Robert Hoehne
1999-04-01 0:00 Robert Hoehne
1999-01-22 14:15 ` Robert Hoehne
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Stan Shebs
1999-01-22 17:55 ` Stan Shebs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox