* [BUG?] testsuite/gdb.threads/step.exp question
@ 2008-01-28 17:40 Pierre Muller
2008-01-28 18:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pierre Muller @ 2008-01-28 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Is it on purpose that
there is no code trying to compile
step.c source in step.exp nor in step2.exp?
Pierre Muller
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUG?] testsuite/gdb.threads/step.exp question
2008-01-28 17:40 [BUG?] testsuite/gdb.threads/step.exp question Pierre Muller
@ 2008-01-28 18:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2008-01-28 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pierre Muller; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:18:45PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote:
> Is it on purpose that
> there is no code trying to compile
> step.c source in step.exp nor in step2.exp?
Probably. Those tests are old; I do not know if they work, since
they've never run in all the time I've been working on GDB.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-28 17:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-28 17:40 [BUG?] testsuite/gdb.threads/step.exp question Pierre Muller
2008-01-28 18:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox