From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
To: "'Pedro Alves'" <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [RFA] Fix memory leak in windows_xfer_shared_libraries
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 07:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000301cdd9d0$0db345d0$2919d170$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50CA3784.2030706@redhat.com>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Pedro Alves
> Envoyé : jeudi 13 décembre 2012 21:16
> À : Pierre Muller
> Cc : gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet : Re: [RFA] Fix memory leak in windows_xfer_shared_libraries
>
> On 12/13/2012 11:11 AM, Pierre Muller wrote:
> > --- windows-nat.c 13 Nov 2012 09:46:10 -0000 1.236
> > +++ windows-nat.c 13 Dec 2012 10:54:18 -0000
> > @@ -2411,11 +2411,11 @@ windows_xfer_shared_libraries (struct ta
> > buf = obstack_finish (&obstack);
> > len_avail = strlen (buf);
> > if (offset >= len_avail)
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > - if (len > len_avail - offset)
> > + len= 0
> > + else if (len > len_avail - offset)
> > len = len_avail - offset;
> > - memcpy (readbuf, buf + offset, len);
> > + if (len > 0)
> > + memcpy (readbuf, buf + offset, len);
> >
>
> You can avoid the last if by writing as:
>
> if (offset >= len_avail)
> len = 0;
> else
> {
> if (len > len_avail - offset)
> len = len_avail - offset;
> memcpy (readbuf, buf + offset, len);
> }
>
> I'd prefer that, but patch is okay either way.
I committed with your modification.
Thanks for the approval.
> > obstack_free (&obstack, NULL);
> > return len;
>
> >
> > I was also wondering if it would not be better to keep the obstack in
> > between the two calls, but that would probably require some static
> variable
> > :(
>
> That'd be fine. We actually do that in some cases in gdbserver, like
> handle_qxfer_threads and handle_qxfer_traceframe_info. It just didn't
> look like worth it enough to bother when I initially wrote this.
I was wondering if this would become a problem if we later add support for
multiple inferior
for windows-nat
I vaguely remember that I tried to achieve this a long time ago...
Anyhow, the memory leak is gone at least!
Pierre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-14 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <50c9b7e6.25f2440a.3810.3771SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2012-12-13 20:16 ` Pedro Alves
2012-12-14 7:53 ` Pierre Muller [this message]
2012-12-14 10:12 ` Pedro Alves
2012-12-14 10:26 ` [RFA] Fix other memory leak in solib_target_current_sos Pierre Muller
2012-12-14 10:55 ` Pedro Alves
2012-12-14 13:07 ` [RFA-v2] " Pierre Muller
2012-12-14 13:49 ` Pedro Alves
[not found] ` <43198.6185875305$1355480794@news.gmane.org>
2012-12-14 14:14 ` [RFA] " Tom Tromey
2012-12-14 23:29 ` Pierre Muller
2012-12-13 11:11 [RFA] Fix memory leak in windows_xfer_shared_libraries Pierre Muller
2012-12-13 11:23 ` Pierre Muller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000301cdd9d0$0db345d0$2919d170$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr' \
--to=pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox