From: David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>
To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: C++/Java regressions
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yf2ekvwv094.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031125170632.D8D974B409@berman.michael-chastain.com> (Michael Elizabeth Chastain's message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:06:32 -0500 (EST)")
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:06:32 -0500 (EST), mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) said:
> I asked:
mec> What is the correct output when a breakpoint is taken on
mec> "A::bar(int) const" ?
Probably my first choice would be A::bar(int) const, and my second
choice would be A::bar. A::bar const seems a bit weird to me. Having
said that:
> After some deliberation, I decided that I want the test script
> to be liberal in what it accepts.
...
> If someone wants to spend time on making gdb's output better here,
> that is okay with me. But I decided that it's too low priority for
> my attention and the list bandwidth.
> David C is that okay with you?
Yes, that's fine with me. What is important is that the breakpoint be
set on the correct method, and that the continue reach the correct
breakpoint. That is in fact happening; I don't really see the point
of having a failing test there, or even a kfailing test.
David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-25 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-25 17:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-25 17:14 ` David Carlton [this message]
2003-11-25 17:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-26 22:48 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-26 21:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-26 22:21 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-26 22:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-26 22:34 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-26 21:18 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-26 21:33 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-25 15:33 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-25 14:49 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-25 15:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-25 4:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-25 17:54 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-25 1:37 David Carlton
2003-11-25 3:58 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-26 4:04 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-26 15:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-26 21:05 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-26 21:11 ` David Carlton
2003-11-26 21:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-26 21:32 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-12-01 16:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-30 2:57 ` Jim Blandy
2003-11-30 3:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yf2ekvwv094.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com \
--to=carlton@kealia.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox