From: wolfgang.rostek@gmx.de (Wolfgang Rostek)
Subject: [lttng-dev] major variations in perfomance figures
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:47:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <trinity-44577199-4bb4-4bf1-8595-785637f25968-1428072450572@3capp-gmx-bs60> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+jJMxuEdC4aaAZci3rwWM3sGJbyqchBeuVG2iTM5Ag11zKPwg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi J?r?mie,
thanks for your feedback.
I've added only a loop to the end of the demo programm.
Frequence scaling I can't imagine on my dektop machine.
It is a jump between 350ns and 800ns. In the loop below
all the events of one test run are of equal time distance,
either slow or fast.
Wolfgang R.
https://github.com/lttng/lttng-ust/blob/master/doc/examples/demo/demo.c
...
tracepoint(ust_tests_demo, starting, 123);
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
netint = htonl(i);
tracepoint(ust_tests_demo2, loop, i, netint, values,
text, strlen(text), dbl, flt);
}
tracepoint(ust_tests_demo, done, 456);
tracepoint(ust_tests_demo3, done, 42);
for (i = 0; i < 300; i++) {
if(i % 10 == 0) {
tracepoint(ust_tests_demo, done, i); <=========
}
}
fprintf(stderr, " done.\n");
return 0;
}
> Gesendet: Freitag, 03. April 2015 um 16:22 Uhr
> Von: "J?r?mie Galarneau" <jeremie.galarneau at efficios.com>
> An: "Wolfgang Rostek" <wolfgang.rostek at gmx.de>
> Cc: "lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org" <lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org>
> Betreff: Re: [lttng-dev] major variations in perfomance figures
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Wolfgang Rostek <wolfgang.rostek at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I did a first perfomance test extending the demo example
> > by tracing 30 simple integers in a loop.
> >
> > For a similar CPU (i5 quad core 2.8GHz) I saw values
> > mentioned around 250ns in the forum.
> >
> > I've tried the test several time and could come down
> > to about 350ns. The machine was almost idle for all
> > tests.
> >
> > What makes me wonder is a large variation with frequent
> > runs giving me 750-800ns.
> >
> > Not the absolute time but the variations isn't clear
> > to me. From my understanding the caller path is more
> > or less straight to shared memory. Why do different
> > runs show more than double the time for the traces?
>
> Good question. Can you share the benchmark's code?
> Also, make sure frequency scaling is disabled on your system; it could
> explain these kinds of variations.
>
> J?r?mie
>
> >
> > Wolfgang R.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lttng-dev mailing list
> > lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
>
>
>
> --
> J?r?mie Galarneau
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-03 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <trinity-1e9921b3-666b-4656-bcb8-a2125944698f-1427831168919@3capp-gmx-bs39>
2015-04-03 14:22 ` Jérémie Galarneau
2015-04-03 14:47 ` Wolfgang Rostek [this message]
2015-04-03 15:21 ` Jérémie Galarneau
2015-04-03 15:34 ` Wolfgang Rostek
2015-04-03 16:49 Jesper Derehag
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=trinity-44577199-4bb4-4bf1-8595-785637f25968-1428072450572@3capp-gmx-bs60 \
--to=wolfgang.rostek@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox