From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: stephen.hemminger@vyatta.com (Stephen Hemminger)
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [ltt-dev] liburcu: likely and unlikely macro collision
In-Reply-To: <20111101220018.GA19730@Krystal>
Message-ID: <fc9da044-1918-4936-9d4c-b0a2a8c977cc@tahiti.vyatta.com>


> likely()/unlikely() seems to be amongst the last macros that urcu
> defines that don't have urcu-specific prefixes. Thoughts on whether
> we
> should add a prefix such as caa_likely() and caa_unlikely() are
> welcome.

In our usage of liburcu, I had to do macro whacking to workaround
this conflict.  Even wrapping the definition in urcu with '#ifndef likely'
would help.