From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mjeanson@efficios.com (Michael Jeanson)
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:51:57 -0400
Subject: [lttng-dev] [RFC lttng-modules v4] Add kmalloc failover to
	vmalloc
In-Reply-To: <2105422460.18557.1506437855430.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
References: <1506351380-4988-1-git-send-email-mjeanson@efficios.com>
 <1217070996.17685.1506352743808.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
 <2e9e834c-2694-f7db-c6f6-ae048dee22fe@efficios.com>
 <2105422460.18557.1506437855430.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Message-ID: <fb827131-67aa-752a-175b-041c6b3fb0ee@efficios.com>

On 2017-09-26 10:57, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> I don't know what the side effects of setting the caller to NULL would
>> be here, you're the kernel developer I'll trust you on that one.
>>
>> So whichever solution you prefer.
> 
> I'll take your patch as is.

Ok, I'll send a non-RFC version. Just to make sure we're on the same
page, I wouldn't backport this to the stable branches since it's a
pretty significant change of behaviour.