Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: i@eivanov.com (Evgeniy Ivanov)
Subject: [lttng-dev] Deadlock in call_rcu_thread when destroy rculfhash node with nested rculfhash
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:03:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO6Ho0e27-JTmUPrTRZfr95Lm=ri+mOSRNr7Av5Ma0t1ucuH6g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO6Ho0ea+Mhdoea4b3EL-J4z2wifHPWohq1ps74LQBU+b0-OOQ@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry, found partial answer in docs which state that cds_lfht_destroy
should not be called from a call_rcu thread context. Why does this
limitation exists?

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Evgeniy Ivanov <i at eivanov.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Each node of top level rculfhash has nested rculfhash. Some thread clears
> the top level map and then uses rcu_barrier() to wait until everything is
> destroyed (it is done to check leaks). Recently it started to dead lock
> sometimes with following stacks:
>
> Thread1:
>
> __poll
> cds_lfht_destroy    <---- nested map
> ...
> free_Node(rcu_head*)  <----- node of top level map
> call_rcu_thread
>
> Thread2:
>
> syscall
> rcu_barrier_qsbr
> destroy_all
> main
>
>
> Did call_rcu_thread dead lock with barrier thread? Or is it some kind of
> internal deadlock because of nested maps?
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Evgeniy
>



-- 
Cheers,
Evgeniy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20161019/cb8771fc/attachment-0001.html>


  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-19 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-19  9:56 Evgeniy Ivanov
2016-10-19 10:03 ` Evgeniy Ivanov [this message]
2016-10-19 15:03   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-10-21  8:19     ` Evgeniy Ivanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAO6Ho0e27-JTmUPrTRZfr95Lm=ri+mOSRNr7Av5Ma0t1ucuH6g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=i@eivanov.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox