From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: munisekharrms@gmail.com (Muni Sekhar)
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 12:07:00 +0530
Subject: [lttng-dev] lttng view - doubt
Message-ID: <CAHhAz+inXQ-fqkL61Gfo2wp3owiAN_SxCwyjtp8hZvVnHq9GwQ@mail.gmail.com>

 [ Please keep me in CC as I'm not subscribed to the list]


Hello,


Few lines of lttng view trace about workqueue events:

[11:07:08.208795325] (+0.000001677) testbox irq_handler_entry: {
cpu_id = 1 }, { irq = 16, name = "debug_irq" }

[11:07:08.208822703] (+0.000027378) testbox workqueue_queue_work: {
cpu_id = 1 }, { work = 0xFFFF8801396D4F18, function =
0xFFFFFFFFC07273B0, req_cpu = 256 }

[11:07:08.208824380] (+0.000001677) testbox workqueue_activate_work: {
cpu_id = 1 }, { work = 0xFFFF8801396D4F18 }

[11:07:08.208826615] (+0.000002235) testbox irq_handler_exit: { cpu_id
= 1 }, { irq = 16, ret = 1 }

[11:07:08.208831364] (+0.000004749) testbox workqueue_execute_start: {
cpu_id = 1 }, { work = 0xFFFF8801396D4F18, function =
0xFFFFFFFFC07273B0 }

[11:07:08.208841422] (+0.000010058) testbox workqueue_execute_end: {
cpu_id = 1 }, { work = 0xFFFF8801396D4F18 }





Can it be possible to print function name instead of ‘function =
0xFFFFFFFFC07273B0’?

-- 
Thanks,
Sekhar