From: jonathan.r.julien@gmail.com (Jonathan Rajotte)
Subject: [lttng-dev] scale numbers for LTTNG
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:02:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF4oYfHHARzj+h_nKVb8+M=KAn=LHDesZbj=O34qjiAVTDKJ8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHxF_R9iWBOU=hawM8ZjJCVG3TV7YZOtkwvaqhm2MTdwza48jg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2274 bytes --]
Hi Vijay,
Could you share with us a test program or details on how you evaluated
those limitation ?
Thanks
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Vijay Anand <vjanandr85 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Could anyone please let us know how do we go about this ?
>
> Regards,
> Vijay
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Vijay Anand <vjanandr85 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Folks,
>>
>> We have been evaluating LTTNG for use in our production systems for user
>> space tracing. We have evaluated most of the features supported by LTTNG
>> and very much see a value add LTTNG brings into our debugging
>> infrastructure.
>>
>> - Our current requirement is to trace Userspace programs running on
>> linux.
>> - Each of the linux processes define their own tracepoint providers.
>> - We would like to trace event histories of each process
>> independently.
>> - We could potentially have 1000s of such processes running
>> simultaneously.
>> - We concluded on using a session/channel to trace one tracepoint
>> provider corresponding to a unique process.
>> - But I understand we could also create one system wide session
>> and use channels to trace each of the providers. Either of the approaches
>> seems to work for us.
>> - But upon evaluating I see that we could create only 25 active
>> process-sessions and not traces from all the processes are logged.
>> - Please note I have tried increasing the buffer size and the
>> number of buffers. This doesn't help.
>> - Each of the process trace 52 events at and interval of 1 second
>> each.
>> - I have evaluated this with lttng in session,live and snapshot modes
>> and I have not been getting favourable.
>>
>> Could you folks share the scale numbers that LTTNG supports, especially
>> when it comes to tracing user space programs ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vijay
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
>
>
--
Jonathan Rajotte Julien
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20160526/64747f61/attachment.html>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-26 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-24 6:01 Vijay Anand
2016-05-26 12:23 ` Vijay Anand
2016-05-26 18:02 ` Jonathan Rajotte [this message]
2016-05-26 19:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-05-30 7:16 ` Vijay Anand
2016-05-30 13:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAF4oYfHHARzj+h_nKVb8+M=KAn=LHDesZbj=O34qjiAVTDKJ8A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jonathan.r.julien@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox