From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id Wn1HLk+wMWlpNBkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:01:19 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lists.lttng.org header.i=@lists.lttng.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mx header.b=otFVaT5l; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lists.lttng.org header.i=@lists.lttng.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Kgd/bF+5; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id AC0C11E0B3; Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:01:19 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from m43-8.mailgun.net (m43-8.mailgun.net [69.72.43.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id D28811E08D for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:01:18 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.lttng.org; q=dns/txt; s=mx; t=1764864078; x=1764871278; h=Sender: Sender: Reply-To: From: From: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: Cc: To: To: Subject: Subject: Message-ID: Date: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version; bh=Yx8Uu7SJ6BGa6AyNeIaOb3YJBHI/oxEMZWcAyuuW4do=; b=otFVaT5lN9Z7Scf4Rhk4BOH9UEYiiid6soUvqiJJFEbY9zG3ARsPhkpEXqsKe0pjuE+NxiJXCNCtgNRfdNMB9Jcy0MWNHEsBWrkLANlmg7NVNx2EFUMH8ljixm6JgTwa9VwZUa640p4iGYUxAFaIg+GAGo5jlgFcE0kD0knD112BuwI4erLPjRaLzaZmP+u5xA5LIynqE5q5TV1PGadbMzaYAPIqPn92rmq2PK2J/2qWoiiy9Imoz7aUzk9JAK7XNo5EoxhS/pNJnTkT5OAfjq0UGYZuL/1NR/LLGF/HaOYP2Uwki/dIs+VwId87apA8Hbxu8WJkO/sY6PHbHGWSvw== X-Mailgun-Sid: WyJkOTk2OCIsInB1YmxpYy1pbmJveEBzaW1hcmsuY2EiLCI2MDIzMjMiXQ== Received: from lists.lttng.org (lists.lttng.org [158.69.130.29]) by 19d85e42d4c8437ffb5c27427554071bfcfb79ecb634ec7905d102340139c378 with SMTP id 6931b0496333663c6550bbaa (version=TLS1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Thu, 04 Dec 2025 16:01:13 GMT X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.43.8 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.2.1 lists.lttng.org 4dMfPg6Bykz10gw ARC-Seal: i=1; d=lists.lttng.org; s=arc1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1764864071; b=JD0zjR0x7jN2hStifTIXVtoB5HzsYkpxFssaKS+rl0WzVMbVFNpWJN6JPbMbX+dRj0qL oPwXcXoAGlQ1jp7Qiyb7zWmBlUtvJk9Z0OWPt809WP+He/SOE0m/rskAXPpzjZ5Abe4wG DTfyCjNsbn3pIvF3u/MmZx3Xzf7XvItap8jyQqoeYaJrXOlvMnboKnQ5WK5MeJxYfdjkb VZotLgkO/d9iJeumJzUPgmn/AOcfB4RRkvivlA05g6bO5j4LqRn/2SrrgeZ+LxqcP3An3 T01d/jwvtO/7AHfm5jB0HbBCnkLiUywiXxQhk0OgVhAzYQpT91IwNmv/OQ4AUkABrdQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=lists.lttng.org; s=arc1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; t=1764864071; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:From; bh=Yx8Uu7SJ6BGa6AyNeIaOb3YJBHI/oxEMZWcAyuuW4do=; b=ewzwHtNIy8cQXz9DdwcCjOq0T+4Af33oV0K4ssSVWpsxEskwlgi5XJ7yhaIDQGb9gIY6 +D3BWx/HOopAPCpzsaprcmAXA89GGPp4ZT0ghdJ2YcAluCrjL5PJ2mFIwbqSWGYGMW38u 3RQS6nQwwcdHsgQCtMXmIANiumR/hm/m0aHaq+0K5bxaevfHhYCxqrSb6PTy7BwWrIf1D dlAPcv297U7Zgc+CBONBDFBZKZ+uuBvmNSMCM1mu+iEc9vvtVB3ReHUh/oCLuK8UfrYOp hsLYaFO6u/Kb/kA+qvslvZREgi1H2FFX+4L2hpWVI66s6BhNFo/pj0HxpjFju4gL3zg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.lttng.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip="::1" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 lists.lttng.org 4dMfPg6Bykz10gw DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lists.lttng.org; s=default; t=1764864071; bh=Yx8Uu7SJ6BGa6AyNeIaOb3YJBHI/oxEMZWcAyuuW4do=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=Kgd/bF+5POm4fzVEE6uMg4N0lZKkULrhwlfgFv6B7iBw5yrAk2LVtR3koa3BZC3gU yPOytFsyfyHrmeTdYDKlODMvsOhcYU/1y9Qm2Fq27gvno+qd8oevtusfshVD5o7uDN fNJ4b7qnxdas73n7ZMHvyfoX69R+dn6xwgTC+4zYNm4KPCIL3Ps1HBj29Cv+TBn55+ 9ZR/ZLKMqfQzpPZgmYntlajWOJwl7Hf8uHlHVi5wFZNeAPDl7QQGKEFPLbzK0d9knk d4mF53Cf42f7v+xtqivYAVypbp4qbu+N3SbSGo8p3zY+tEWnmOQ8MWSfRCt/SLOsBh fEeuT+d7QkDpQ== Received: from lists-lttng01.efficios.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.lttng.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dMfPg6Bykz10gw; Thu, 4 Dec 2025 11:01:11 -0500 (EST) ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.2.1 lists.lttng.org 4dMfPf45T7z113M DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 lists.lttng.org 4dMfPf45T7z113M Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) by lists.lttng.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dMfPf45T7z113M for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2025 11:01:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-594285c6509so1166137e87.0 for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2025 08:01:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1764864069; x=1765468869; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Yx8Uu7SJ6BGa6AyNeIaOb3YJBHI/oxEMZWcAyuuW4do=; b=kDEbN+liaitaFgMFZgdquuSIg6Axiyz1fTQj/MjUwva14r59RW/KwwYCnXXBHGehXp cTQdjCmZq8qd42T2ADlWPkPqj5m6JgnN4QzfAhY05nHDQMiEz5nuhIjgWcb9cDvmBcT5 3rNs/P2aw6csHYIcBIvuKve3nSp7Chc4OAWij9s5g2w871bcsR7NmodswA0ygeotx05Z tyKLMYoM0gz4vaMmTiuBkAyL765391GqdWDehd9OGk9qPuwPBi3/L+o/deRJHvn2Mt5o EfamT+XEeOqT1reh7F6DBD1eJfz6W/3EM5qkfqftDENgDpjrBRPFKu+3Mvj8AZ3mxis9 yazA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxBGozQBZEXZ+L4/t/Hl+Ho4L8cikhmEpWnJcldbR+VaAfKI/Sa MD5wO+aC4HdVdSm4MMJge8Ytd36zt9esobcJSapNVAZyUBoW8UGNdt5nKrlFf4hKwpmhzgbNpTM +SDOtcCiokMGCxNdRXQgVB3iYNmZ0ICg= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs4W7/Fq3pHuHNfX20erEukQxmYtEw+YfcPZMo5t0+TDc5TO8PfhEvbe6QV3FD z0S7Y8QkiGqejczKxA5nx3za5dl9RmpM8b1IK3jRm5JVWUs+Yo+7XRbd49ZwVBcAjSRd0m2yLco JtTZ22MmyvNAeuPp6iyIcmAP1UReNJrRfp+6DcWL0INCycAYfN6NDn27JS4bsfDUwVsLHqL7M6Q 0g4++N509VuuJTUFHNL5lOCDMJwzRL1UGuFijZU1YzmvSZ2bbONK1xkoe2/UIBp+vveMqAakDdW Wolpsg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH8FT1fekoSVNSjPKPrV0djFju1+Ivruh+HAlH5iRUZ+QVhlNmFzHLoshKsoRs+dJplXwTO53gl7Uks4qVffUk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:10cc:b0:595:7e2d:9889 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-597d3f01804mr2440786e87.1.1764864068096; Thu, 04 Dec 2025 08:01:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6407e79bb0b5bc49f73b200d9a5f40eef14e70af.camel@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <6407e79bb0b5bc49f73b200d9a5f40eef14e70af.camel@siemens.com> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 11:01:05 -0500 X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bmXRo4NF6CcvYXjNS7UyGLrN-1V1vgX2R-K97HgOnUEsTWNIN8EqkI8eE8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: babeltrace | sink.ctf.fs escaping of struct member names To: "MOESSBAUER, Felix" Cc: "lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org" , "Kiszka, Jan" , "Poljakow, Andre" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: LTTng development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev Reply-To: Philippe Proulx Errors-To: lttng-dev-bounces@lists.lttng.org Sender: "lttng-dev" On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 10:47=E2=80=AFAM MOESSBAUER, Felix wrote: > > Well... This is a more generic question if it is really the job of the > serializer to fix possible name clashes in the output. Anyways, > unfortunately LTTng uses this field and does not allow escaping. Although I understand the question, I will not take the time to re-evaluate a design that involves CTF 1.8. I'm currently in a "quick fixes only" mode for this format, with the sole aim of keeping existing scenarios working. > I would love to switch to CTF2, however we need support for it in > trace-compass, which AFAIK is not even implemented yet. We're currently investigating the status of CTF 2 support in Trace Compass and what amount of work is remaining. We'll let you know. > This is tricky, as we don't really know if the trace is an LTTng trace > or not. However, we can hide it behind the proposed create-lttng-index > flag, as it is anyways only needed in combination with an index (I > still don't know why, but ok...). Yes we know. Have a look at make_lttng_trace_path_rel(). `create-lttng-index` would be another hint, but the trace environment has been good enough so far. Phil