From: jeremie.galarneau@efficios.com (Jérémie Galarneau)
Subject: [lttng-dev] Quick question about discarded events
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:44:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+jJMxubqyOfqwJpsxOh9rX=BZkvck_bBRR9xGQjT3BLNP7eKw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48CF5AC71E61DB46B70D0F388054EFFD267A0FA7@VAL-E-01.valcartier.drdc-rddc.gc.ca>
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Thibault, Daniel <
Daniel.Thibault at drdc-rddc.gc.ca> wrote:
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:32:02 +0100
> From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?David_Lindstr=F6m?="
> <david.lindstrom at percepio.se>
>
> > If I encounter a trace where a packet contains the events_discarded field
> > with a non-zero value, I want to warn/notify the user. Were the events
> > discarded before the timestamp_begin of the packet, after timestamp_end
> or
> > in between? I basically want to plot some symbol on my timeline
> > approximately where the user can expect bad/missing data.
> >
> > Mvh
> > David Lindstr?m
>
> I do believe the events were lost in between the begin and end packet
> timestamps.
>
>
That's my interpretation too... which gives me an opportunity to bump bug
#589 [1].
It seems Babeltrace and TMF's interpretation of the specification differ on
this point. Mathieu can probably settle the debate ;)
Cheers,
J?r?mie
[1] https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/589
> Daniel U. Thibault
> Protection des syst?mes et contremesures (PSC) | Systems Protection &
> Countermeasures (SPC)
> Cyber s?curit? pour les missions essentielles (CME) | Mission Critical
> Cyber Security (MCCS)
> R & D pour la d?fense Canada - Valcartier (RDDC Valcartier) | Defence R&D
> Canada - Valcartier (DRDC Valcartier)
> 2459 route de la Bravoure
> Qu?bec QC G3J 1X5
> CANADA
> Vox : (418) 844-4000 x4245
> Fax : (418) 844-4538
> NAC : 918V QSDJ <http://www.travelgis.com/map.asp?addr=918V%20QSDJ>
> Gouvernement du Canada | Government of Canada
> <http://www.valcartier.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
>
--
J?r?mie Galarneau
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20131105/cf8976ed/attachment.html>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 13:38 Thibault, Daniel
2013-11-06 1:44 ` Jérémie Galarneau [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-04 13:32 David Lindström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+jJMxubqyOfqwJpsxOh9rX=BZkvck_bBRR9xGQjT3BLNP7eKw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jeremie.galarneau@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox