From: compudj@krystal.dyndns.org (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Fix the once in a while freeze of the tests
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:40:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP7067B8C7E0A54D7A47160C96D60@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D613705.5000502@gmail.com>
* Yannick Brosseau (yannick.brosseau at gmail.com) wrote:
> On 2011-02-20 10:17, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Mathieu Desnoyers (compudj at krystal.dyndns.org) wrote:
> >
> >> * Yannick Brosseau (yannick.brosseau at gmail.com) wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sometimes, the thread in the read function would lock the pipe so the
> >>> setlinebuf would freeze on it. Set the linebuf before we create the
> >>> thread to fix this deadlock
> >>>
> >> Can you update the description to show which locks are involved in this
> >> deadlock scenario ? E.g.
> >>
> >> - CPU A - CPU B
> >>
> >> function function
> >> lock A (taken) lock B (taken)
> >> lock B (waiting)
> >> lock A (waiting) <-- deadlock
> >>
> >> Or show it with the lock chain dependency analysis. But it's important
> >> to have this information along with this kind of fix.
> >>
> > Hrm, ok I looked at tap.c, and it's not a deadlock at all: it's rather
> > that the _tap_comment_stdout thread can start using pipe_r_file when it
> > is still uninitialized.
> >
> >
> I found a lock in the calls to fgets and setlinebuf, deep in the glibc.
> If what you says is true, the fix I've proposed is not right. Its the
> pthread_create that should be moved.
>
I don't understand. It should only be the relative order of init vs
pthread_create (the user of this structure) that matters, no ?
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-20 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-18 21:36 Yannick Brosseau
2011-02-20 0:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-20 15:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP101D3A13834942CDAF72E4196D60@phx.gbl>
2011-02-20 15:45 ` Yannick Brosseau
2011-02-20 18:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BLU0-SMTP7067B8C7E0A54D7A47160C96D60@phx.gbl \
--to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox