From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: luccisa@cisco.com (Alex Luccisano (luccisa)) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:57:17 -0500 Subject: [ltt-dev] no metadata tracefile In-Reply-To: <20110922133617.GA30684@Krystal> References: <20110922133617.GA30684@Krystal> Message-ID: <979ADE62523D094FB865A35E3DB0D83F0326DC0E@XMB-RCD-207.cisco.com> Hi Mathieu, > -----Original Message----- > From: Mathieu Desnoyers [mailto:compudj@krystal.dyndns.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:36 > To: Ji Zhai > Cc: ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca > Subject: Re: [ltt-dev] no metadata tracefile > > * Ji Zhai (Ji.Zhai at ca.flextronics.com) wrote: > > Hi Mathieu, > > > > I'd like to know if you have had time to review my question. If > > possible, can you please give me a guide/direction to debug this > > issure? > > Hi Ji, > > Sorry, I am pretty busy on UST 2.0 these days. > > About your question you might want to try adding "printf" statements > within marker.c in UST, and also try compiling UST with -DUST_DEBUG=1 so > enable debugging output. I fear there is a linker issue on your system, > but unfortunately I don't have access to your setup. > > Try comparing the outputs of a simple test program in your powerpc > target setup, in a native host x86 setup, and in a native host x86_64 > setup. This way you should be able to identify what is missing. [AL:] I've been helping with this effort and what you describe above is exactly what I did here: http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/ltt-dev/2011-September/005135.htm l There seems to be some problem with __start__ust_marker_ptrs. How should this be linked with the "foo" binary? Regards, Alex > > Best regards, > > Mathieu