From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 1433NwiX2mRspAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:05:12 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lists.lttng.org header.i=@lists.lttng.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=OCHElT4J; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D2BCD1E0C2; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:05:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists.lttng.org (lists.lttng.org [167.114.26.123]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D2861E028 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:05:10 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lists.lttng.org; s=default; t=1692047110; bh=hNSbByIu5Yx+I7MvmiEAOWOLMEfbQG0+mZXG2iW669g=; h=To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=OCHElT4JsjF9GGpRsA3qqeKdAEigyvG5shIA72522a9AZPqy07bsEeXTu/HSpZRFC EcjoJWf91HarTSJRW4wDefPYmP+TQPA3WpXwvOYW0UdQbwygpr0brbbVdQUPdoKrgG 9ySi98OMdChTj2byHYO2FuXgAq3899fx/1GOB5Ywog92Pv/0p+m567VG07k3bnMDoV s24Il2g5N8Q4sFCPDyxvmZTM4129OPh1jRizm3xssI5cTwXKkPej50NHKpOyGyXdy4 o8ef+8e3QYJwyyAOuHEfR+tvncaLc3vwQzilC97MY0FnI71LHsJY4y2lgs+DwuzMuw eS+gWl1Eb4HFw== Received: from lists-lttng01.efficios.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.lttng.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RPn3V06btz2MG9; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:05:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpout.efficios.com (smtpout.efficios.com [167.114.26.122]) by lists.lttng.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RPn3S2GQCz2MCw for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:05:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (modemcable094.169-200-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.169.94]) by smtpout.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4RPn3P2m0Qz1LcY; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:05:05 -0400 (EDT) To: lttng-dev Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" In-Reply-To: <87v8gzuc3g.fsf@laura> Organization: EfficiOS References: <87v8gzuc3g.fsf@laura> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:05:05 -0400 Message-ID: <87jztxjpxa.fsf@laura> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC] Deprecating RCU signal flavor X-BeenThere: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: LTTng development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Olivier Dion via lttng-dev Reply-To: Olivier Dion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: lttng-dev-bounces@lists.lttng.org Sender: "lttng-dev" After discussing it with Mathieu, we agree on the following 3 phases for deprecating the signal flavor: 1) liburcu-signal will be implemented in term of liburcu-mb. The only difference between the two flavors will be the public header files, linked symbols and library name. Note that this add a regression in term of performance, since the implementation of liburcu-mb adds memory barriers on the reader side which are not present in the original liburcu-signal implementation. 2) Adding the deprecated attribute to every public functions exposed by the liburcu-signal flavor. At this point, tests for liburcu-signal will also be removed from the project. There will be no more support for this flavor. 3) Removing the liburcu-signal flavor completely from the project. Finally, here is a tentative versions release of mine for each phase: 1) 0.15.0 [October 2023] (also TSAN support yay!) 2) 0.15.1 3) 0.16.0 || 1.0.0 (maybe a major bump since this is an API breaking change) -- Olivier Dion EfficiOS Inc. https://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev