From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mjeanson@efficios.com (Michael Jeanson) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:59:16 -0400 Subject: [lttng-dev] [RFC lttng-modules v4] Add kmalloc failover to vmalloc In-Reply-To: <2136492543.18709.1506441425836.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <1506351380-4988-1-git-send-email-mjeanson@efficios.com> <1217070996.17685.1506352743808.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <2e9e834c-2694-f7db-c6f6-ae048dee22fe@efficios.com> <2105422460.18557.1506437855430.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <2136492543.18709.1506441425836.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Message-ID: <7e5b6ade-ba4d-d7eb-c1ce-6565bce87933@efficios.com> On 2017-09-26 11:57, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Michael Jeanson mjeanson at efficios.com wrote: > >> On 2017-09-26 10:57, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >>>> I don't know what the side effects of setting the caller to NULL would >>>> be here, you're the kernel developer I'll trust you on that one. >>>> >>>> So whichever solution you prefer. >>> >>> I'll take your patch as is. >> >> Ok, I'll send a non-RFC version. Just to make sure we're on the same >> page, I wouldn't backport this to the stable branches since it's a >> pretty significant change of behaviour. > > Already merged into master, 2.10, 2.9, sorry. > > Mathieu > > Well then, let's make sure we test it properly before doing any point release to the stable branches.