From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [lttng-dev] [RFC lttng-modules v4] Add kmalloc failover to vmalloc In-Reply-To: <7e5b6ade-ba4d-d7eb-c1ce-6565bce87933@efficios.com> References: <1506351380-4988-1-git-send-email-mjeanson@efficios.com> <1217070996.17685.1506352743808.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <2e9e834c-2694-f7db-c6f6-ae048dee22fe@efficios.com> <2105422460.18557.1506437855430.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <2136492543.18709.1506441425836.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <7e5b6ade-ba4d-d7eb-c1ce-6565bce87933@efficios.com> Message-ID: <727182319.18716.1506441833522.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> ----- On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:59 AM, Michael Jeanson mjeanson at efficios.com wrote: > On 2017-09-26 11:57, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> ----- On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Michael Jeanson mjeanson at efficios.com wrote: >> >>> On 2017-09-26 10:57, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >>>>> I don't know what the side effects of setting the caller to NULL would >>>>> be here, you're the kernel developer I'll trust you on that one. >>>>> >>>>> So whichever solution you prefer. >>>> >>>> I'll take your patch as is. >>> >>> Ok, I'll send a non-RFC version. Just to make sure we're on the same >>> page, I wouldn't backport this to the stable branches since it's a >>> pretty significant change of behaviour. >> >> Already merged into master, 2.10, 2.9, sorry. >> >> Mathieu >> >> > > Well then, let's make sure we test it properly before doing any point > release to the stable branches. Of course, Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com