From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust 7/7] Add a check against excluders
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:05:13 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <682132616.66259.1384351513959.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383819755-6891-8-git-send-email-jp_ikaheimonen@mentor.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "JP Ikaheimonen" <jp_ikaheimonen@mentor.com>
> To: lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2013 5:22:35 AM
> Subject: [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust 7/7] Add a check against excluders
>
> When matching enablers with events, first check against all
> excluders of the enabler. If the event matches with any of the excluders,
> then the event does not match with the enabler.
>
> Signed-off-by: JP Ikaheimonen <jp_ikaheimonen at mentor.com>
> ---
> liblttng-ust/lttng-events.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/liblttng-ust/lttng-events.c b/liblttng-ust/lttng-events.c
> index 915cffb..fa5596c 100644
> --- a/liblttng-ust/lttng-events.c
> +++ b/liblttng-ust/lttng-events.c
> @@ -491,6 +491,29 @@ static
> int lttng_desc_match_enabler(const struct lttng_event_desc *desc,
> struct lttng_enabler *enabler)
> {
> + struct lttng_ust_excluder_node *excluder;
> +
> + /* If event matches with an excluder, return 'does not match' */
> + cds_list_for_each_entry(excluder, &enabler->excluder_head, node) {
> + int found = 0;
Why is "found" declared here ? Why is it initialized to 0 ?
> + int count, len;
> + char *excluder_name;
> +
> + for (count = 0; count < excluder->excluder.count; count++) {
Rather than declared here ?
> + excluder_name = (char *)(excluder->excluder.names)
> + + count * LTTNG_UST_SYM_NAME_LEN;
> + len = strnlen(excluder_name, LTTNG_UST_SYM_NAME_LEN);
> + if (len > 0 && excluder_name[len - 1] == '*') {
> + found = strncmp(desc->name, excluder_name, len - 1);
strncmp and "found" have reversed logic. I'd assign found = !strncmp(....).
> + } else {
> + found = strncmp(desc->name, excluder_name,
> + LTTNG_UST_SYM_NAME_LEN - 1);
> + }
> + if (!found) {
and reverse this condition.
The other patches in this patchset look good !! Good job !!
Thanks,
Mathieu
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> switch (enabler->type) {
> case LTTNG_ENABLER_WILDCARD:
> return lttng_desc_match_wildcard_enabler(desc, enabler);
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-13 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-07 10:22 [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust 0/7] UST Event exclusions JP Ikaheimonen
2013-11-07 10:22 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust 1/7] Define a new command LTTNG_UST_EXCLUSION JP Ikaheimonen
2013-11-07 10:22 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust 2/7] Define exclusion structure for UST ABI JP Ikaheimonen
2013-11-07 10:22 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust 3/7] Send exclusion data through ustcomm JP Ikaheimonen
2013-11-07 10:22 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust 4/7] Add excluders to enabler structure JP Ikaheimonen
2013-11-07 10:22 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust 5/7] Store exclusions to enablers JP Ikaheimonen
2013-11-07 10:22 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust 6/7] Add handler for LTTNG_UST_EXCLUSION in UST ABI JP Ikaheimonen
2013-11-07 10:22 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust 7/7] Add a check against excluders JP Ikaheimonen
2013-11-13 14:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2013-11-13 20:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-14 7:26 ` Ikaheimonen, JP
2013-11-14 14:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-14 14:26 ` Ikaheimonen, JP
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=682132616.66259.1384351513959.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox