From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan.rajotte-julien@efficios.com (Jonathan Rajotte Julien) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:21:55 -0400 Subject: [lttng-dev] Compilation error in lttng-tools (version.c) In-Reply-To: References: <5591AB85.60903@efficios.com> Message-ID: <5592A603.9080508@efficios.com> Hi, On 2015-06-29 04:52 PM, Daniel Olivier wrote: > Hi, > > Indeed, I'm running autoconf 2.63: > > SC-1:~/trace_ea/foss/lttng-tools # autoconf --version > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.63 > ... > SC-1:~/trace_ea/foss/lttng-tools # automake --version > automake (GNU automake) 1.10.1 > ... > > The system is SLES11: > SC-1:~/trace_ea/foss/lttng-tools # uname -a > Linux SC-1 3.0.101-0.47.52-default #1 SMP Thu Mar 26 10:55:49 UTC 2015 (0e3c7c8) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > SC-1:~/trace_ea/foss/lttng-tools # cat /etc/issue > > Welcome to SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP3 (x86_64) - Kernel \r (\l). > > Is there a way to check the autoconf version (during configuration), in order to make the error more explicit? We would add a check for autoconf >= 2.64 during the bootstrap sequence. But this not solve the issue for SLES11sp3. I did find people trying to support both 2.63 and >= 2.64 [1] but it has some downside. It might be a way to do it. One way to solve the issue would be to do daily distribution tarballs (signed of course) so you dont have to bootstrap everything. Cheers ! [1] https://github.com/gdnsd/gdnsd/blob/master/configure.ac > > Thanks, > Dan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Rajotte Julien [mailto:Jonathan.rajotte-julien@efficios.com] > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 4:33 PM > To: lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org > Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Compilation error in lttng-tools (version.c) > > Hey Daniel, > > As you suggested it look like it's not generated on ./configure when it should. > The problem come from the AC_INIT macro interpretation from Autoconf. > The AC_INIT macro we currently use was > introduced in autoconf 2.64. Look like you are running Autoconf 2.63. > > AC_INIT 2.63: > *AC_INIT*(package, version,[bug-report],[tarname]) > > AC_INIT 2.64: > *AC_INIT*(package, version,[bug-report],[tarname],[url]) > > Which distribution are you using? > > Cheers ! > > On 2015-06-29 03:52 PM, Daniel Olivier wrote: >> I am getting: >> >> make[3]: Entering directory `/root/trace_ea/foss/lttng-tools/src/bin/lttng' >> depbase=`echo commands/version.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`;\ >> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../src -I../../../include -include config.h -I../../../include -I../../../src -DINSTALL_BIN_PATH=\""/usr/local/bin"\" -Wall -g -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -MT commands/version.o -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o commands/version.o commands/version.c &&\ >> mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Po >> commands/version.c: In function 'create_version': >> commands/version.c:71: error: 'PACKAGE_URL' undeclared (first use in >> this function) >> commands/version.c:71: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported >> only once >> commands/version.c:71: error: for each function it appears in.) >> make[3]: *** [commands/version.o] Error 1 >> >> I gather that PACKAGE_URL should get generated by configure step into config.h (or something)... >> >> Attached is config.log, but I didn't find that it contained any errors pertaining to this. >> >> Anybody ever see this? >> >> Thanks, >> Daniel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lttng-dev mailing list >> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org >> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev > -- > Jonathan R. Julien > Efficios > > > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev -- Jonathan R. Julien Efficios