From: duncan.sands@deepbluecap.com (Duncan Sands)
Subject: [lttng-dev] DEBUG_RCU vs RCU_DEBUG
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:07:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5534B3CA.6030306@free.fr> (raw)
I noticed that urcu-qsbr.h checks for RCU_DEBUG being defined while the rest of
userspace-rcu (0.8.6) checks DEBUG_RCU. Is this a mistake or a cunning plan?
Ciao, Duncan.
next reply other threads:[~2015-04-20 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-20 8:07 Duncan Sands [this message]
2015-04-23 19:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-04-23 19:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5534B3CA.6030306@free.fr \
--to=duncan.sands@deepbluecap.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox