From: Paul_Woegerer@mentor.com (Woegerer, Paul)
Subject: [lttng-dev] baddr feature triggers deadlock in lttng-ust
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:33:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531057D3.1070607@mentor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561294755.31915.1393536606539.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Hi Mathieu,
this is very unfortunate. I tested forks as well but couldn?t find any
issues on x86_64. Ironically, last week we found an issue that matches
your description on PowerPC but since we could not reproduce it on x86 I
blamed it on the peculiarities of that platform and worked on seemingly
higher priority issues instead.
For the sake of damage containment I just posted:
http://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/2014-February/022494.html
to the list.
Not having that feature in 2.4 (at least in the experimental form
suggested above) would be a disaster for us.
Meanwhile I'm trying to think about a more fundamental solution to the
problem. But I'm afraid your comment about rethinking of the locking
strategy for the entire UST might come true.
Thanks,
Paul
On 02/27/2014 10:30 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Please see http://bugs.lttng.org/issues/745, which explains a deadlock
> we just found out.
>
> We might have to disable the baddr dump feature, since our release is
> tomorrow. We'll have to re-think our locking to protect operations
> using the dynamic loader lock against fork, clone, and daemon.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
--
Paul Woegerer, SW Development Engineer
Sourcery Analyzer <http://go.mentor.com/sourceryanalyzer>
Mentor Graphics, Embedded Software Division
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-28 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1640835527.31912.1393536374130.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
2014-02-27 21:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-27 23:37 ` Alexandre Montplaisir
2014-02-28 0:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-28 9:33 ` Woegerer, Paul [this message]
2014-02-28 12:38 ` Woegerer, Paul
2014-02-28 14:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=531057D3.1070607@mentor.com \
--to=paul_woegerer@mentor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox