From: holler@ahsoftware.de (Alexander Holler)
Subject: [lttng-dev] current_thread_info() not respecting program order with gcc 4.8.x
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:18:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528E94E2.3080102@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyNZun07BLoD2KQFT7cN1xsiQ2gE6hYwRvOGa3tCap4CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am 21.11.2013 23:32, schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Alexander Holler <holler at ahsoftware.de> wrote:
> The bug is not that gcc can re-order or combine the accesses to "sp".
> WE WANT THAT TO HAPPEN.
Sure, and I don't disagree on that.
>
> The bug is *outside* that "current_thread_info()" macro/inline
> function. It's the *dereference* of the pointer that gcc re-orders.
> AND THAT IS WRONG.
>
> Gcc seems to mess up the alias analysis, and decide that the
> deferences cannot alias. Which is wrong. They clearly *can* alias,
> exactly because the value of "sp & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)" ends up having
> the same value all the time.
Sorry, that I still disagree.
I try to describe it more clearly why I still think that the problem
might be because of that const declaration.
(...)
foobar1 = current_thread_info() __attribute_const__ {
return sp->somewhere_local;
}
(...)
foobar2 = current_thread_info() __attribute_const__ {
return sp->somewhere_local;
}
So, even if sp is the same in both cases, that const states that
wherever sp points to is local to current_thread_info(), so it can't be
the same for both cases.
Regards,
Alexander Holler
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-21 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-11 2:18 [lttng-dev] might_sleep warnings in overwrite mode Nathan Lynch
2013-11-11 15:47 ` Nathan Lynch
2013-11-14 18:16 ` Nathan Lynch
2013-11-15 2:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-18 19:30 ` Nathan Lynch
2013-11-19 15:29 ` [lttng-dev] current_thread_info() not respecting program order with gcc 4.8.x Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-19 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-19 16:13 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-19 16:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-19 16:05 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-19 17:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-19 17:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-19 21:56 ` [lttng-dev] Multiple local register variables w/ same register Richard Henderson
2013-11-19 22:08 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-19 22:13 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-19 22:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-19 22:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-20 0:41 ` [lttng-dev] current_thread_info() not respecting program order with gcc 4.8.x Linus Torvalds
2013-11-20 15:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-21 16:02 ` Alexander Holler
2013-11-21 22:12 ` Luis Lozano
2013-11-21 22:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-21 23:03 ` Bhaskar Janakiraman
2013-11-21 23:18 ` Alexander Holler [this message]
2013-11-21 23:45 ` Luis Lozano
2013-11-22 0:39 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-22 1:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-22 2:36 ` Luis Lozano
2013-11-22 3:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-22 8:16 ` Luis Lozano
2013-11-22 13:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-22 8:18 ` Luis Lozano
2013-11-22 8:33 ` Luis Lozano
2013-11-22 13:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-22 20:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-22 0:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-22 0:34 ` Alexander Holler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528E94E2.3080102@ahsoftware.de \
--to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox