From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini)
Subject: [lttng-dev] [URCU PATCH 1/3] wfcqueue: implement concurrency-efficient queue
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:47:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5072F57E.4020308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121002141444.GB4057@Krystal>
Il 02/10/2012 16:14, Mathieu Desnoyers ha scritto:
> +/*
> + * Concurrent queue with wait-free enqueue/blocking dequeue.
> + *
> + * Inspired from half-wait-free/half-blocking queue implementation done by
> + * Paul E. McKenney.
> + *
> + * Mutual exclusion of __cds_wfcq_* API
> + *
> + * Unless otherwise stated, the caller must ensure mutual exclusion of
> + * queue update operations "dequeue" and "splice" (for source queue).
> + * Queue read operations "first" and "next" need to be protected against
> + * concurrent "dequeue" and "splice" (for source queue) by the caller.
> + * "enqueue", "splice" (for destination queue), and "empty" are the only
> + * operations that can be used without any mutual exclusion.
> + * Mutual exclusion can be ensured by holding cds_wfcq_dequeue_lock().
> + *
> + * For convenience, cds_wfcq_dequeue_blocking() and
> + * cds_wfcq_splice_blocking() hold the dequeue lock.
> + */
Hi,
can you add a for-like macro for iteration? Iteration does not require
holding the lock and assumes that you are the sole user of the data
structure, which is useful together with splice.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-08 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-02 14:13 [lttng-dev] [URCU PATCH 0/3] wait-free concurrent queues (wfcqueue) Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-02 14:14 ` [lttng-dev] [URCU PATCH 1/3] wfcqueue: implement concurrency-efficient queue Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-08 15:47 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-10-08 16:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-08 16:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-08 18:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-10 2:56 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-10 4:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-02 14:15 ` [lttng-dev] [URCU PATCH 2/3] wfcqueue test Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-02 14:16 ` [lttng-dev] [URCU PATCH 3/3] call_rcu: use wfcqueue, eliminate false-sharing Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-08 3:09 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-08 14:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-08 15:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-08 16:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-03 18:28 ` [lttng-dev] [rp] [URCU PATCH 0/3] wait-free concurrent queues (wfcqueue) Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-03 21:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-04 18:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-08 3:33 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-08 15:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-10 2:53 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-10 4:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5072F57E.4020308@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox