From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.montplaisir@polymtl.ca (Alexandre Montplaisir) Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:15:59 -0400 Subject: [lttng-dev] Required Kernel In-Reply-To: <20120403125948.GD14534@Krystal> References: <4F7AF093.7010804@gmail.com> <20120403125948.GD14534@Krystal> Message-ID: <4F7AF80F.5000801@polymtl.ca> On 12-04-03 08:59 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > We should probably put a kernel version compability matrix, Oh god, please, no... I'm still having nightmares from http://git.lttng.org/?p=lttv.git;a=blob_plain;f=doc/developer/lttng-lttv-compatibility.html;hb=HEAD ;) Granted, the minimum requirement could be advertised a bit more prominently (on the lttng2.0 page for example). Also, I remember someone being able to run it on 2.6.35 by backporting 1 or 2 kernel patches. Perhaps it'd be worth re-testing and documenting this procedure somewhere? Cheers, -- Alexandre Montplaisir DORSAL lab, ?cole Polytechnique de Montr?al