From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: david.goulet@polymtl.ca (David Goulet)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:24:10 -0400
Subject: [ltt-dev] UST communication library
In-Reply-To: <4DF8CE12.1080309@gmail.com>
References: <4DF7D1F6.5000402@polymtl.ca>	<4DF841C5.6070508@polymtl.ca>	<4DF8C859.40904@polymtl.ca>	<4DF8C94E.9090104@gmail.com>	<4DF8CCB8.3050103@polymtl.ca>
	<4DF8CE12.1080309@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4DF8CE9A.9060700@polymtl.ca>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Exactly! Thus having a hard dependency is completely out of question.

On 11-06-15 11:21 AM, Yannick Brosseau wrote:
> 
>> Enlighten me Yannick :)
>>
>> # apt-get install lttng-tools
>>
>> How are you going to have the UST support without installing the UST
>> package
>> (assuming that libustcomm is inside ust) ?
>>
>> I figure you'll have a "Not found libust.so..." at execution time ?
> 
> Exactly, for the *runtime* dependency, that would be a *recommand* and
> we detect if libusb is present or not. But  that's really up to the
> packager to decide how he does it. Each distro might have their own
> policies.
> 
> As the upstream developer, you should let the user decide if he want UST
> support or not. I might be building an embedded system were space is a
> constraint and I would want to only  have the kernel tracer and not
> bother with he userspace one.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN+M6aAAoJEELoaioR9I02y2AIALFkB/eEGG6V5of2dDPZ3NbL
MegoK0zV1rOh4XlMTuncdIfez7m21eore9FwkLvc2Lc6C0YpmbTmYnJgT52Ngz86
5L5YsHdpnYbkJ929UHwRZNByITmWRMJo71kI8+FAra5zw5EsVA5uRPJs6rvvsqlL
Xly+ldJsSUBE2B+1/dlx3oGugQ/3UqszPGdkFIml6HXZo1MnzlYljHg4r1x7a/eq
gjFGhlrqRuEC0orYrErK/F647Ng7WZmUcVGHp/5bThXWfKjUjymgNJFzz03YRixl
/us0FsZJr7n7Fz34AgJP7qEp/qcgcyGchcaI0seCYmr4yTbgnw1BvGuxzW6BTLg=
=zqFf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----